摘要
在新课程实施过程中有两点值得引起我们思考:第一,语文课程标准对语文课程性质是“工具性与人文性的统一”的表述。语言是观念性的,“语文工具论”是认识语文课程性质的基础;“人文性”窄化了语言的功能,不利于充分发挥语文教育的整体功能;语言与文学不在同一层次,工具性与人文性不属于一对范畴;人文教育古已有之,“泛人文化”无助于提高语文教育质量。第二,语文课程标准将学习方式方法归为课程理念。课程理念即课程指导思想,它处于课程的宏观层面,而教学(学习)方式方法则处于课程的微观层面。教学(学习)方式方法的具体实施,实质上是一个如何正确认识和处理教学的科学性与艺术性辩证关系的问题,而不是一个课程理念问题。
In the course of the new curriculum implementation,there are two points that deserve our thinking.Firstly,the describtion of the nature of Chinese curriculum in the Chinese curriculum standards is the unification of the tool and humanities.Language bears some ideas,"language tool"is the basis for understanding the nature of language courses.The humanity narrows the function of language and is not conducive to giving full play to the whole function of language education.Language and literature are not in the same level,Tool and humanity do not belong to a pair of category.Humanity education has existed since ancient times,"pan-humanity"does not help to improve the quality of language education. Secondly,Chinese curriculum standard regards learning approach as the curriculum idea.Curriculum ideas are the curriculum guiding principles which are in the course of the macro level.While the teaching (learning) approaches are at the micro level of courses.The implementation of the teaching(learning) approach is a problem about how to understand and handle the relations between the nature of science and art of the teaching correctly,but not the problem of curriculum idea
出处
《课程.教材.教法》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第8期34-41,共8页
Curriculum,Teaching Material and Method
关键词
语文
课程改革
课程性质
改革反思
学习方式
Chinese
curriculum reform
curriculum nature
reflection on the reform
learning approach