期刊文献+

缺乏“乌托邦”维度的新历史主义与文学史的书写——约翰·卡洛斯·罗访谈录(续)

New Historicism without a Utopian Dimension and the Writing of Literary History:An Interview with John Carlos Rowe(Part Ⅱ)
原文传递
导出
摘要 在这篇专访当中,美国南加州大学教授约翰.卡洛斯.罗质疑了海登.怀特的"新历史主义者"身份,结合格林布拉特的创作实践说明"新历史主义"缺乏乌托邦维度,并讨论了文学史书写与文学研究的关系问题。 In this interview,John Carlos Rowe,Professor at University of Southern California,questions Hayden White's identity as a New Historicist and on the basis of analyzing Greenblatt's practice,points out that the problem of New Historicism lies in its lack of a dimension of utopia. He also discusses the relationship between the writing of literary history and literary studies.
作者 苏仲乐
出处 《外国文学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第4期142-146,共5页 Foreign Literature
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Rowe, John Carlos. At Emerson ' s Tomb : The Politics of Classic American Literature. New York: Columbia UP, 1997.
  • 2Rowe, John Carlos. Henry Adams and Henry James : The Emergence of a Modern Consciousness. Ithaca and London: Cornell UP, 1976.
  • 3Rowe, John Carlos. Literary Culture and U. S. Imperialism: From the Revolution to World War II. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2000.
  • 4Rowe, John Carlos. The New American Studies. Minneapolis, London: U of Minnesota P, 2002.
  • 5Rowe, John Carlos. The Other Henry James. Durham and London: Duke UP, 1998.
  • 6Rowe, John Carlos. The Theoretical Dimensions of Henry James. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1984.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部