摘要
目的:观察消糜栓治疗宫颈糜烂的疗效及安全性。方法:随机将112例宫颈糜烂患者分为治疗组63例、对照组50例,治疗组采用消糜栓,对照组采用复方沙棘籽油栓。结果:两种方法治疗宫颈糜烂的疗效差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论:消糜栓与复方沙棘籽油栓比较,消糜栓治疗宫颈糜烂疗效显著。
OBJECTIVE： To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Erosion-removal Suppository for cervical erosion. METHODS： 112 patients with cervical erosion were randomly divided into two groups： 62 in experimental group were treated with Erosion-removal Suppository and 50 in control group with Compound Seabuckthorm Seed Oil Suppository. RESULTS： There were significant differences between the two groups in therapeutic efficacy for cervical erosion （P 0. 05）. CONCLUSION： Compound Seabuckthorm Seed Oil Suppository is clinically more effective than Erosion - removal Suppository for cervical erosion.
出处
《中国医院用药评价与分析》
2010年第7期622-623,共2页
Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-use in Hospitals of China
关键词
消糜栓
复方沙棘籽油栓
宫颈糜烂
Erosion - removal Suppository
Compound Seabuckthorm Seed Oil Suppository
Cervical erosion
