期刊文献+

数据库分级定价模式及其应用中的权益保障问题 被引量:4

Database Tiered Pricing Models and the Rights Protection Problems of their Applications
原文传递
导出
摘要 数据库采购活动中出现的分级定价模式有助于更多图书馆参与数据库采购活动,目前采用的分级方法主要是以经济实力、机构性质、FTE、科研实力、使用量等因素作为分级依据。通过对各种数据库分级定价模式的特点进行分析,并对CALIS近两年数据库采购方案进行实证研究,讨论各种数据库分级定价模式应用现状和引发的权益问题,进而针对分级定价模式的应用提出改进建议。 Database tiered pricing models will help more libraries to purchase databases. The main tiered methods currently used are made basing on the economic strength , or institution character, or research strength, or usage amount. The article analyzes the characteristics of every database tiered pricing models, and discusses the application status of these models with the rights protection problems arousing from them by means of empirical research on the nearly two years of CALIS' s database purchasing proposals , and then propose recommendations for improvement.
出处 《图书情报工作》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第15期31-34,85,共5页 Library and Information Service
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"引进数字资源合作管理权益分享理论与实证研究"(项目编号:08BTQ009)研究成果之一
关键词 数据库 分级定价模式 权益保障 图书馆 database tiered pricing strategies rights protection library
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Stephen Rhind-Tutt. Pricing models for electronic products - as tangled as ever? [ 2010 - 04 - 10 ]. http ://www. alexanderstreetpress, com/articles/0211, pricingmodels, htm.
  • 2强自力.电子资源的价格模型及其对CALIS的启示[J].大学图书馆学报,2002,20(3):43-45. 被引量:19
  • 3史会斌,李垣.基于公平理论的联盟管理研究评述[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,29(4):161-168. 被引量:15
  • 4Stange K, Hormia-Poutanen K, Gronvall K B, et al. Cost division model in BIBSAM and FinELib consortia. [2010 -04 -01 ]. http ://uksg. metapress, com/media/87ext5a9tkdxtm4ejngm/contri- butions/0/x/k/g/0xkglfcejut7fc9y, pdf.

二级参考文献42

  • 1[1]Rhind-Tutt S.What a tangled web we weave:a review of pricing models and the forces that drive them.Against the Grain,1998,10(1).http://www.alexanderst.com/article02.htm
  • 2Ring, P.S. and Van De Ven, A.H. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1994,19(1): 90-118
  • 3Kumar, N. and Scheer, L.K. The effects of supplier fairness on vulnerable resellers [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1995,32(1): 54-65
  • 4Colquitt, J.A. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2001,86(3):386-400
  • 5Adams, J.S., Toward an understading of inequity [J]. Journal of Abnormal and social Psychology,1963(67):422-436
  • 6Greenberg, J. Organizational justice: yesterday, today, and tomorrow [J]. Journal of Management,1990,16(2):399-424
  • 7Deutsch, M. Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for ditributive justice [J]. Journal of Social Issues,1975,31(3):137-149
  • 8Lind, E.A. and Tyler, T. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice [M]. New York: Plenum,1988:56-60
  • 9Ambrose, M., Hess, R.L. and Ganesan, S. The relationship between justice and attitudes: An examination of justice effects on event and system-related attitudes [J]. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 2007,103(1): 21-36
  • 10Folger, R. and Konovsky, M.A.. Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1989,32(1):115-130

共引文献32

同被引文献25

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部