期刊文献+

论唐代的配隶刑 被引量:3

On a Special Means of Punishment Named Peili of the Tang Dynasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 配隶是流刑的一个变种,但重于普通流刑,两者之间的区别在于:普通流刑只居作一年,然后就可在当地附籍为民,而配隶则要长时间做苦役。配隶并不一定将犯人罚入军队,而是多将其发遣到边远的州郡服役,所以常被称为配州。配隶在唐代的出现主要有两方面的原因:首先是五刑制度本身存在的缺陷所致;其次是出于充实国防的目的。配隶刑对后世刑制产生了重要影响。 The punishment which named Peili was a distortion of common exile and was heavier than common exile in the penalty degree. The difference between them was that if a person was sentenced to common exile, he only needed to serve hard labor for one year, but if he was sentenced to Peili, he needed to serve hard labor for a longer period. If a per- son was sentenced to Peili, it was not necessary to make him do hard labor in the army. The people sentenced to Peili were usually escorted to the border areas, so Peili was also named Peizhou. The emergence of Peili in Tang Dynasty had two reasons. The first reason was that the new five penalty system had great shortcomings. The second reason was on the purpose of strengthening national defense. Peili had a significant impact on the penalty system of later dynasties.
作者 张春海
机构地区 南京大学法学院
出处 《史学月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第8期34-40,共7页 Journal of Historical Science
关键词 唐代 配隶 流刑 刑罚 Tang dynasty Peili exile penalty
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献60

共引文献10

同被引文献18

  • 1刘俊文.论唐后期法制的变化[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1986,23(2):85-95. 被引量:9
  • 2郭东旭.宋代编管法[J].河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1992,17(3):12-16. 被引量:3
  • 3齐涛.论唐代流放制度[J].人文杂志,1990(3):93-97. 被引量:8
  • 4陈俊强.《试论唐代流刑的成立及其意义》,高明士主编:《唐代的身份法制研究-以名例律为中心》,(台湾)五南出版社2003年版,第263页.
  • 5陈俊强.《北朝流刑的研究》[J].法制史研究,2006,.
  • 6周一良.《北魏镇戍制度考及续考》..《魏晋南北朝史论集》.,.第225页.
  • 7周一良.《北魏镇戍制度考及续考》,《魏晋南北朝史论集》,中华书局1963年版.
  • 8谷霁光.《补魏书兵志》,《谷霁光史学文集》第1卷,江西人民出版社1996年版,第292、295页.
  • 9唐长孺.《北朝的兵》,《魏晋南北朝史论拾遗》,中华书局1983年版,第268页.
  • 10谷霁光.《镇戍与防府》,《谷霁光史学文集》第1卷,第360-361、363、357页.

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部