期刊文献+

多元模式下的认知转喻研究 被引量:1

The Cognitive Metonymy Studies from the Perspective of Multiple Patterns
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在现代认知语言学这一范式下,转喻研究呈现出多元化特点。从认知的角度研究转喻主要有三种模式:Lakoff,K vecses等以ICM理论为基础展开的研究;Langacker的认知语法对转喻的研究;以Fillmore等提出的框架理论为基础展开的研究。这三种模式的共同特点是追求揭示转喻的本质,都希望能把语言中纷繁芜杂的转喻现象置于自己的认知理论框架下,从而达到统一解释的目的。 Within the cognitive linguistic paradigm, metonymy is studied from multitudinous perspectives. The paper investigates three representative models among them: metonymy under the ICM theory practiced by Lakoff, K vecses and others; metonymy under cognitive grammar by Langacker; metonymy under framework theory by Fill- more and others. Aiming to discover the nature of metonymy, the three models hope to, in a unified manner, include and explain all the diversified metonymic phenomena.
作者 樊朝辉
出处 《湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2010年第3期156-160,共5页 Journal of Hubei Minzu University:Philosophy and Social Sciences
关键词 转喻 ICM理论 认知语法 框架理论 metonymy ICM theory cognitive grammar frame theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Ulmann,S.1962.Semantics:An Introduction to the Science of Meaning[M].Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
  • 2Lakoff,G.& M.Johnson.Metaphors We Live By[M].Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1980.
  • 3Lakoff,G.Women,Fire and Dangerous Things[M].Chicago:University Of Chicago Press.
  • 4Radden,G.& Z.Kovecses.Towards a theory of metonymy[C].In Klaus-Uwe,Panther.& G.Radden.(eds.) Metonymy in Language and Thought.Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins Publishing Company.1999,17-59.
  • 5Kovecses,Z.Metaphor:A Practical Introduction[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2002.
  • 6文旭,叶狂.转喻的类型及其认知理据[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2006,29(6):1-7. 被引量:89
  • 7Lakoff,G.The contemporary theory of metaphor[C].In Ortony,A.(ed.) Metaphor and Thought.(2nd ed.).Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1993:202-251.
  • 8Langacker,R.Grammar and Conceptualization[M].Berlin & New York:Mouton de Gruyter,1999.
  • 9Langacker,R.Reference point construction[J].Cognitive Linguistics,1993,(4):1-38.
  • 10Ronald W.Langacker.Metonymy in Grammar[J].外国语,2004,27(6):2-24. 被引量:46

二级参考文献54

  • 1沈家煊.转指和转喻[J].当代语言学,1999,1(1):3-15. 被引量:718
  • 2沈家煊.语言的“主观性”和“主观化”[J].外语教学与研究,2001,33(4):268-275. 被引量:2264
  • 3林书武.隐喻研究的基本现状、焦点及趋势[J].外国语,2002,25(1):38-45. 被引量:202
  • 4Barlow, Michael. A Situated Theory of Agreement [M]. New York: Garland, 1992.
  • 5Chafe, Wallace. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing [M]. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
  • 6Fauconnier, Gilles. Mental Spaces." Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language [M]. Cambridge,MA and London: MIT Press/Bradford, 1985.
  • 7Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Minds Hidden Complexities [M]. New York: Basic Books, 2002.
  • 8Gensler, Orin D. Non-Syntactic Antecedents and Frame Semantics[A]. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting ofthe Berkeley Linguistics Society[Z]. 1977, 3:321-334.
  • 9Haiman, John. Dictionaries and Encyclopedias [J]. Lingua, 1980, 50: 329-357.
  • 10Hankamer, Jorge, and Ivan Sag. Deep and Surface Anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry, 1976, 7: 391-428.

共引文献131

同被引文献16

  • 1张辉 ,孙明智 .概念转喻的本质、分类和认知运作机制[J].外语与外语教学,2005(3):1-6. 被引量:146
  • 2Lakoff G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things : What Categories Reveal about the Mind[M]. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1987:147 - 148.
  • 3Langacker R W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar ( vol. I) : Theoretical Prerequisites[M]. Standford, California: Standford University Press, 1987.
  • 4Taylor J R. Linguistic Categorization : Prototypes in Linguistic Theory [M]. Oxford: Clarendon Paperbacks, 1989.
  • 5Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez, Francisco J. From semantic underdetermination via metaphor and metonymy to conceptual interaction [ A ]. In Theoria et Historia Scientiarum, An International Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies, Volume. 1 [C]. Torun, Poland : The Nicolas Copernicus University Press,1999.
  • 6Koch P. Frame and contiguity: on the cognitive bases of metonymy and certain types of word formation [ A ]. In K - U. Panther and G. Radden(eds). Metonymy in Language and Thought [ C ]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1999.
  • 7Ullmann S. Semantics: An Introduction to the Science of Meaning [M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1962.
  • 8思维[EB/OL].百度百科网.http://baike.baidu.com/view/17753.htm,2008/06/09.
  • 9Radden G, Panther K U. Introduction: reflections on motivation[ A]. In: G. Radden and K. - U. Panther( eds. ). Studies in Linguistic Motivation ( Cognitive Linguistics Reseach 28 ) [C]. Berlin and New York, 2004:3 - 46.
  • 10Langacker R W. Grammar and Conceptualization [ M ]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部