期刊文献+

对“主观病历”能否作为诉讼证据的几点思考 被引量:2

A Few Points of "Subjective Case History" be Taken as Litigation Evidence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 主观病历是不允许患者复制的,但医疗机构却将其作为诉讼的证据,违背了证据交换原则,由此产生了一些争议。通过对主观病历作为诉讼证据而引发的争议以及主观病历是否能够作为诉讼证据进行相关分析和探讨,提出了相应的建议。 ubjective case history is not permitted to copy,but hospital takes it as litigation evidence,which contrary to the principle of exchanging evidence,this resulted in controversy.This paper mainly analysis and discuss dispute of the subjective case history evidence as liti-gation and whether the subjective case history evidence as litigation related,and make some recommendations accordingly.
出处 《医学与社会》 2010年第8期73-74,77,共3页 Medicine and Society
关键词 主观病历 诉讼 证据 Subjective case history Litigation Evidence
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献12

共引文献8

同被引文献27

  • 1李彬.电子病历的应用现状及发展对策初探[J].医学与社会,2005,18(6):46-49. 被引量:22
  • 2刘占河,张万里,孙志坚.病历作为医疗纠纷诉讼证据使用常见的问题[J].中国医院,2005,9(7):57-58. 被引量:4
  • 3喻观培.论病历在医疗诉讼中的证据作用[J].医学与社会,2005,18(7):44-45. 被引量:5
  • 4Mann R, Williams J. Standards in medical record keeping [J]. Clin Med, 2003,3(4) :329 -332.
  • 5CarPenter I, Ram MB, Croft GP, et al. Medical records and record keeping standards[ J]. Clin Med,2007, 7 (4) : 328 - 331.
  • 6Twomey J, Cummins A. Good record keePing [ J ]. World of Irish Nursing, 2010,18 (3) :38 - 39.
  • 7National Health Service. Health Records Standard Operat- ing Procedures [ EB/OL ]. [ 2014 - 04 - 20 ] httP ://www. rcht. nhs. uk/DocumentsLibrary/RoyalCornwallHosPital- sTrust/HeahhInformatics/CorPorateAndHealthRecords/ HealthRecordsStandardOPeratingProeedures. Pdf.
  • 8Murphy BJ. Principles of good medical record documenta- tion[J]. J Med Pract Manage, 2001(3) :258 -260.
  • 9Griffiths P, Anderson A, Coyne C, et al. Implementing an interprofessional Patient record [ J ]. Clin Med, 2011,1 ! (2) :128 - 131.
  • 10Pullen I, Loudon J. Improving standards in clinical record -keeping[ J]. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 2006, 12(4) : 280 -286.

引证文献2

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部