期刊文献+

文拉法辛缓释片与氟西汀治疗抑郁症临床对照研究 被引量:7

Controlled study of Venlafaxine-xr tablets and Fluoxetine in treatment of depression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨文拉法辛缓释片治疗抑郁症患者的疗效及安全性。方法:将60例抑郁症患者随机分为文拉法辛组(研究组,30例)和氟西汀组(对照组,30例),进行开放式临床对照研究,疗程均为8周。采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(17项,HAMD)及躁狂抑郁印象量表(CG I-BP)评价疗效,采用药物不良反应量表(TESS)评价不良反应。结果:治疗8周后,文拉法辛组和氟西汀组的HAMD总分均明显减低,文拉法辛组HAMD减分率为(61.0±14.0)%,氟西汀组为(60.0±12.5)%,差异无统计学意义(t=0.063,P=0.951)。文拉法辛组临床总有效率为86.6%,氟西汀组为83.3%,差异无统计学意义(x2=0.131,P=0.718)。文拉法辛组的不良反应发生率为23.3%(7/30),氟西汀组为26.6%(8/30),差异无统计学意义(x2=0.089,P=0.766)。结论:文拉法辛缓释剂治疗抑郁症患者起效较快,疗效确切,安全性好。 Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine' xr in treatment of depression.Methods:60 cases with depression were divided randomly into two groups: Venlafaxine(30 cases) and fluoxetine(30 cases).All patients were treated and observed within 8 weeks.The efficacy was evaluated by the HAMD and CGI-BP and the side effects were assessed by the TESS.Results: The score of venlafaxine and fluoxetine group are significantly declined within 8 weeks.The HAMD of Venlafaxine group has a(61.0±14.0) % reduction of 86.6% total efficiency;The HAMD of Fluoxetine group has a(60.0±12.5) % reduction of 83.3% total efficiency.There are no significant statistical difference(P〉0.05) between these two groups.The rate of side effects of Venlafaxine is 23.3%,and the Fluoxetine group is 26.6%.There are no significant statistical difference(P〉0.05) between them.Conclusions: Venlafaxine' xr is rapid,effective and safe in treatment of depression.
出处 《中国民康医学》 2010年第15期1936-1938,共3页 Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词 抑郁症 文拉法辛缓释片 氟西汀 Depression Venlafaxine-xr Fluoxetine
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Han D,Wang EC.Remissio~1 from depression:a review of venlafaxine clinical and economic evidence[J].Pharmacoeconomics,2005,23(6):567-581.
  • 2Michael E,Thase MD.Effectiveness of antidepressants:comparative remission rates[J].J Clin Psychiatry,2003,64(Suppl 2):3-7.
  • 3袁勇贵,张石宁.文拉法辛对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗无效的抑郁症患者的疗效[J].中华精神科杂志,2005,38(1):27-29. 被引量:37
  • 4Feighner JP.Mechanism of action of antidepressant medications[J].J Clin Psychiatry,1999,60(Suppl 4):4-11.
  • 5Harvey AT,Rudolph RL,Preskorn SH.Evidence of the dual mechanisms of action of venlafaxine[J].Arch Gen Psychiatry,2000,57:503-509.
  • 6Stahl SM,Entsuah R,Rudolph RL.Comparative efficacy between venlafaxine and SSRIs:a pooled analysis of patients with depression[J].Biol Psychiatry,2002,52:1166-1174.
  • 7Zajecka JM,Albano D.SNRIs in the management of acute major depressive disorder[J].J Clin Psychiatry,2004,65(Suppl 17):11-18.

二级参考文献7

  • 1Fava M, Davidson KG. Definition and epidemiology of treatment-resistant depression. Psychiatr Clin North Am, 1996, 19:179-200.
  • 2中华医学会精神科学会.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准第3版(CCMD-3)[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001.87-89.
  • 3Smith D, Dempster C, Glanville J, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine compared with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other antidepressants: a meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry, 2002, 180:396-404.
  • 4Thase ME, Entsuah AR, Rudolph RL. Remission rates during treatment with venlafaxine or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Br J Psychiatry, 2001, 178:234-241.
  • 5Stahl SM, Entsuah R, Rudolph RL.Comparative efficacy between venlafaxine and SSRIs: a pooled analysis of patients with depression. Biol Psychiatry, 2002, 52:1166-1174.
  • 6Kaplan EM. Efficacy of venlafaxine in patients with major depressive disorder who have unsustained or no response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: an open-label, uncontrolled study. Clin Ther, 2002, 24:1194-1200.
  • 7王荣芝,耿玉友,潘德花,张三晋.万拉法新与氯丙咪嗪治疗双重抑郁症对照研究[J].临床精神医学杂志,2002,12(3):160-160. 被引量:20

共引文献36

同被引文献38

引证文献7

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部