期刊文献+

效用理论在飞行安全风险评估中的应用 被引量:3

Application of Utility Theory in the Evaluation of Flight Safety Risk
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为科学划分飞行安全风险等级,将效用理论引入飞行安全风险领域,利用效用函数,建立了飞行安全风险评估模型。在分析飞行安全风险的基础上,通过定义事故或危险事件损失效应,选取合适的效用函数进行飞行安全风险的度量。模型有效区分了类似飞行事故这样高损失、低概率事件与飞行事故征候这样低损失、高概率事件风险之间的差异,克服了期望值法的局限性。最后通过实例验证了该方法的科学性和有效性。 In order to divide the rank of flight safety risk scientifically, utility theory is introduced into flight safety risk area to establish evaluation model for flight safety risk by using utility function.Based on analysis to the flight safety risk,we choose a proper utility function to measure the flight safety risk by defining the loss effect of accidents or dangerous events.The model can distinguish the difference of risk between the event such as flight accident with high loss but low probability and the event such as flight incident with low loss but high probability, it can also overcome the limitation of expectancy method.Finally, the scientificity and efficiency of the model is verified by a practical example.
出处 《价值工程》 2010年第23期107-108,共2页 Value Engineering
关键词 效用理论 飞行安全风险 损失效应 期望值法 utility theory flight safety risk loss effect expectancy method
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1徐邦年.飞行安全评估概论[M].北京:蓝天出版社.2005.
  • 2Yacov Y.Haimes,胡平(译).风险建模、评估与管理[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,2007.
  • 3蒋军成,郭振龙.安全系统工程[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2003.
  • 4彭俊好,徐国爱,杨义先,汤永利.基于效用的安全风险度量模型[J].北京邮电大学学报,2006,29(2):59-61. 被引量:18
  • 5周林 张文 娄寿春 赵杰.效用函数在防空C3I系统效能评估中的应用.系统工程与电子技术,2000,24(1):14-17.
  • 6陈焱.效用理论在保险中的应用[J].科学技术与工程,2009,9(12):3194-3198. 被引量:9
  • 7Christian Preyssl.Safety risk assessment and management-the ESA approach[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,1995:303-309.
  • 8Huan-Jyh Shyur.A quantitative model for aviation safety risk assessment[J].Computers & Industrial Engineering,2008:34-44.

二级参考文献7

共引文献38

同被引文献35

  • 1秦庭荣,陈伟炯,郝育国,江建华,李创.综合安全评价(FSA)方法[J].中国安全科学学报,2005,15(4):88-92. 被引量:54
  • 2彭俊好,徐国爱,杨义先,汤永利.基于效用的安全风险度量模型[J].北京邮电大学学报,2006,29(2):59-61. 被引量:18
  • 3段晓峰,许学工.沿海防潮堤坝对风暴潮危害的减灾效益研究[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2006,26(3):279-283. 被引量:5
  • 4WANG J. Offshore safety case approach and formal safety assessment ofship[ J] . Journal of Safety Research , 2002, 33: 81 - 115.
  • 5KANG H J, YANG Y S, CHOI J, et al. Time basis ship safety assess-ment model for a novel ship design[ j] , Ocean Engineering, 2013,59:179- 189.
  • 6HU Shenping,FANG Quangen, XIA Haibo, et al. Formal safety as-sessment based on relative risks model in ship navigation[ j] . ReliabilityEngineering and System Safety,2007,92 : 369 - 377.
  • 7ZHANG D, YAN X P, YANG Z L,et al. Incorporation of formal safetyassessment and Bayesian network in navigational risk estimation of theYangtze River [ J ]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety , 2013,118: 93 - 105.
  • 8VANEM E, ANTAO P, OSTVIK I,et al. Analyzing the risk of LNGcarrier operations[ j] . Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2008,93: 1328- 1344.
  • 9FLANAGAN R, NORMAN G. Risk management and construction[M].Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd.,2003 : 107 - 119.
  • 10International Maritime Organization. FSA-Liquefied Natural Gas(LNG ) carriers , MSC 83/INF. 3 [ R] . Denmark: International Mar-itime Organization, 2007.

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部