期刊文献+

AMI患者PCI术后无/慢复流发生与应激血糖及超敏C反应蛋白的关系 被引量:3

Relationship of no or slow reflow of patients with acute myocardial infarction after PCI with the stressing blood sugar or hs-CRP
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者行急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后无/慢复流的发生与应激血糖及超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)的关系。方法:将首次发生且症状出现至就诊时间≤6 h的ST段抬高型心梗(STEMI)患者253例,分成无/慢复流组及对照组,观察两组间应激血糖、hs-CRP及一般资料、手术相关指标之间的差异。结果:26例(10.3%)患者于PCI后出现了无/慢复流,无慢复流组应激血糖、hs-CRP、白细胞数以及罪犯血管开通时间、球囊扩张压力、住院期间病死率均高于对照组(P<0.05或P<0.01)。结论:应激血糖及hs-CRP水平与AMI患者PCI术后无/慢复流的发生有关,并可提示预后不良。 Objective: To study the relationship between the stressing blood sugar or hs-CRP and the occurrence of no or slow reflow in patients with acule myocardial infarction after primary PCI. Methods: We admitted 253 patients with chest pain who had been suspected as STEMI from heart center of our hospital. The time of D-to-B was less than 6 hours. The patients were divided into no or slow reflow group and normal control group according to the results of CAG. Then the differences of general data, the stressing blood sugar, hs-CRP and other surgery-related indicators between the two groups were studied. Results: Twenty-six ( 10.3% ) patients had occurred no or slow reflow after PCI, and the stressing blood sugar,hs-CRP of group with no or slow reflow were significantly increased compared with the normal control group(P 〈0.05 or P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusion: The detection of stressing blood sugar and hs-CRP were correlated to the occurrence of no or slow reflow after primary PCI, and can be used to predict the prognosis.
出处 《江苏大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2010年第4期339-341,共3页 Journal of Jiangsu University:Medicine Edition
关键词 急性心肌梗死 直接经皮冠脉介入 无/慢复流 应激血糖 超敏C反应蛋白 acute myocardial infarction primary PCI no or slow reflow stressing blood sugar high sensitivity C-reactive protein
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献15

  • 1杨新春 王乐丰 佟子川 等.急性心肌梗死症状发作-首次球囊扩张时间和症状发作--进入导管室时间与左心室射血分数和肌酸激酶MB同工酶的关系[J].中国循环杂志,2002,17:77-77.
  • 2[1]Serruys PWJC,de Feyter P,Macaya C,et al.Fluvastatin for the prevention of cardiac events following successful first percutaneous coronary intervention[J].JAMA 2002,287:3215-3222.
  • 3[2]Bolognese L,Falsini G,Liistro F,et al.Epicardial and microvascular reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Ital Heart J,2005,6:447-452.
  • 4[3]Resnic FS,Wainstein M,Lee MK,et al.No-reflow is an independent predictor of death and myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Am Heart J,2003,145:9-11.
  • 5[4]Gin S,Mitchel J F,Hirst JA,et al.Synergy between intracoronary stenting and abciximab in improving angiographic and clinical outcomes of primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction[J].Am J Cardial,2000,86:269-274.
  • 6[5]Wainstein M,Frederic F,Lee M,et al.Lack of clinical efficacy of pharmacologic treatment of the no-reflow phenomenon despite significant angiographic improvement[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2001,37:83-86.
  • 7[6]Kojima S,Sakamoto T,Ishihara M.The white blood cell count is an independent predictor of no-reflow and mortality following acute myocardial infarction in the coronary interventional era[J].Ann Med,2004,36:153-160.
  • 8[7]Okamura A,Ito H,Iwakura K,et al.Usefulness of a new grading system based on coronary flow velocity pattern in predicting outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction having percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Am J Cardiol,2005,96:927-932.
  • 9[8]Burke AP,Tracy RP,Kologie F,et al.Elevated C-reactive protein values and atherosclerosis in sudden coronary death:Association with different pathologies[J].Circulation,2002,105:2019-2023.
  • 10[9]Ishihara M,Kojima S,Sakamoto T,et al.Acute hyperglycemia is associated with adverse outcome after acute myocardial infarction in the coronary intervention era[J].Am Heart J,2005,150:814-820.

共引文献121

同被引文献16

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部