期刊文献+

Reproducibility of the Nottingham modification of the Scarff- Bloom-Richardson histological grading system and the complementary value of Ki-67 to this system 被引量:3

Reproducibility of the Nottingham modification of the Scarff- Bloom-Richardson histological grading system and the complementary value of Ki-67 to this system
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background The reproducibility of the Nottingham modification of the Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (NSBR) histological grading system for invasive breast cancer (IBC) adopted by the World Health Organization (WHO) has previously not been studied in Chinese hospitals. The proliferation marker, Ki-67, has been widely applied in detecting IBC. The objective of this study was to assess the reproducibility of the NSBR system among Chinese pathologists and the complementary value that Ki-67 brings to this system.Methods Four general pathologists graded 100 IBC cases independently, which had previously been graded by specialists in breast pathology. The interobserver reproducibility among four general pathologists and pairwise reproducibility between each of them and the specialists were assessed. The Ki-67 labeling index (Ki-67LI) was determined by immunohistochemistry, and its correlations with histological grade and survival were determined.Results With respect to interobserver reproducibility, NSBR grading was fairly reproducible (kappa=0.34); as for the components of NSBR grading, agreement was best for tubule formation (kappa=0.46), intermediate for nuclear pleomorphism (kappa=0.42), and poorest for mitotic count (kappa=0.28). In terms of pairwise reproducibility, agreement was fair to substantial with NSBR grading (kappa=0.30-0.69) and nuclear pleomorphism (kappa=0.28-0.69), moderate to substantial for tubule formation (kappa=0.51-0.78), and slight to substantial for mitotic count (kappa=0.19-0.71).There were characteristic Ki-67LI ranges for grades 1,2 and 3 tumors. Univariate analysis showed that Ki-67 was able to divide grade 2 patients into two different prognostic subgroups. Multivariate analysis of grade 2 patients with negative lymph node demonstrated that Ki-67 was an independent prognosticator for overall survival.Conclusions The reproducibility of grading by general pathologists could be enhanced. Specialization in breast pathology is essential for accurate grading and treatment for IBC. Ki-67, with proven prognostic significance, adds complementary value to the NSBR system. Background The reproducibility of the Nottingham modification of the Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (NSBR) histological grading system for invasive breast cancer (IBC) adopted by the World Health Organization (WHO) has previously not been studied in Chinese hospitals. The proliferation marker, Ki-67, has been widely applied in detecting IBC. The objective of this study was to assess the reproducibility of the NSBR system among Chinese pathologists and the complementary value that Ki-67 brings to this system.Methods Four general pathologists graded 100 IBC cases independently, which had previously been graded by specialists in breast pathology. The interobserver reproducibility among four general pathologists and pairwise reproducibility between each of them and the specialists were assessed. The Ki-67 labeling index (Ki-67LI) was determined by immunohistochemistry, and its correlations with histological grade and survival were determined.Results With respect to interobserver reproducibility, NSBR grading was fairly reproducible (kappa=0.34); as for the components of NSBR grading, agreement was best for tubule formation (kappa=0.46), intermediate for nuclear pleomorphism (kappa=0.42), and poorest for mitotic count (kappa=0.28). In terms of pairwise reproducibility, agreement was fair to substantial with NSBR grading (kappa=0.30-0.69) and nuclear pleomorphism (kappa=0.28-0.69), moderate to substantial for tubule formation (kappa=0.51-0.78), and slight to substantial for mitotic count (kappa=0.19-0.71).There were characteristic Ki-67LI ranges for grades 1,2 and 3 tumors. Univariate analysis showed that Ki-67 was able to divide grade 2 patients into two different prognostic subgroups. Multivariate analysis of grade 2 patients with negative lymph node demonstrated that Ki-67 was an independent prognosticator for overall survival.Conclusions The reproducibility of grading by general pathologists could be enhanced. Specialization in breast pathology is essential for accurate grading and treatment for IBC. Ki-67, with proven prognostic significance, adds complementary value to the NSBR system.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2010年第15期1976-1982,共7页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 invasive breast cancer histological grading system REPRODUCIBILITY KI-67 prognosis invasive breast cancer histological grading system reproducibility Ki-67 prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Elston CW,Ellis IO.Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer.I.The value of histological grade in breast cancer:experience from a large study with long-term follow-up.Histopathology 1991; 19:403-410.
  • 2Ellis IO,Schnitt SJ,Sastre-Garau X,Bussolati G,Tavassoli FA,Eusebi V,et al.Invasive breast carcinoma.In:Tavassoli FA,Devilee P,eds.World Health Organization Classification of tumors.Pathology and genetics.Tumors of the breast and female genital organs.Lyon:International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2003:18-19.
  • 3Goldhirsch A,Ingle JN,Gelber RD,Coates AS,Thürlimann B,Senn HJ,et al.Thresholds for therapies:highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2009.Ann Oncol 2009; 20:1319-1329.
  • 4Dalton LW,Page DL,Dupont WD.Histologic grading of breast carcinoma.A reproducibility study.Cancer 1994; 73:2765-2770.
  • 5Robbins P,Pinder S,de Klerk N,Dawkins H,Harvey J,Sterrett G,et al.Histological grading of breast caicinomas:a study of interobserver agreement.Hum Pathol 1995; 26:873-879.
  • 6Frierson HF Jr,Wolber RA,Berean KW,Franquemont DW,Gaffey MJ,Boyd JC,et al.Interobserver reproducibility of the Nottingham modification of the Bloom and Richardson histologic grading scheme for infiltrating ductal carcinoma.Am J Clin Pathol 1995; 103:195-198.
  • 7Boiesen P,Bendahl PO,Anagnostaki L,Domanski H,Holm E,Idvall I,et al.Histologic grading in breast cancerreproducibility between seven pathologic departments.South Sweden Breast Cancer Group.Acta Oncol 2000; 39:41-45.
  • 8Meyer JS,Alvarez C,Milikowski C,Olson N,Russo I,Russo J,et al.Breast carcinoma malignancy grading by Bloom-Richardson system vs.proliferation index:reproducibility of grade and advantages of proliferation index.Mod pathol 2005; 18:1067-1078.
  • 9Longacre TA,Ennis M,Quenneville LA,Bane AL,Bleiweiss IJ,Carter BA,et al.Interobserver agreement and reproducibility in classification of invasive breast carcinoma:an NCI breast cancer family registry study.Mod Pathol 2006;19:195-207.
  • 10Dalton LW,Pinder SE,Elston CE,Ellis IO,Page DL,Dupont WD,et al.Histologic grading of breast cancer:linkage of patient outcome with level of pathologist agreement.Mod Pathol 2000; 13:730-735.

同被引文献57

  • 1许良中,杨文涛.免疫组织化学反应结果的判断标准[J].中国癌症杂志,1996,6(4):229-231. 被引量:1365
  • 2刘艳,张瑾,郝晓甍,刘鹏,惠锐.乳腺癌Her-2基因过表达与年龄 临床病理状态的相关性研究[J].中国肿瘤临床,2007,34(24):1392-1395. 被引量:8
  • 3EADIE L H, TAYLOR P, GIBSON A P. A systematic re- view of computer-assisted diagnosis in diagnostic cancer ima- ging [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81(1) : e70-e76.
  • 4LI Feng. Potential clinical impact of advanced imaging and computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiology: importance of ra- diologist 's role and successful observer study [J]. Radiol Phys Technol, 2015, 8(2) : 161-173.
  • 5BOUZIN C, LAMBA SAINI M, KHAING K K, et al. Digital pathology: elementary, rapid and reliable automated image analy- sis [J]. Histopathology, 2015, doi:10.1111/his. 12867.
  • 6BOURZAC K. Software: the computer will see you now [J]. Nature, 2013, 502(7473).. $92-$94.
  • 7WIESMANN V, FRANZ D, HELD C, et al. Review of free software tools for image analysis of fluorescence cell micro- graphs[J]. J Mierosc, 2015, 257(1): 39-53.
  • 8SHINDE V, BURKE K E, CHAKRAVARTY A, et al. Ap- plications of pathology-assisted image analysis of immunohis- tochemistry-based biomarkers in oncology [J]. Vet Pathol, 2014, 51(1): 292-303.
  • 9CHAN J K. The wonderful colors of the hematoxylin-eosin stain in diagnostic surgical pathology [J]. Int J Surg Pathol, 2014, 22(1): 12-32.
  • 10HE Lei, LONG L R, ANTANI S, et al. Histology image a- nalysis for carcinoma detection and grading [J]. Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 2012, 107(3): 538-556.

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部