期刊文献+

刑事冤案形成的原因及对策 被引量:1

The Reason and Strategy on the Wrongful Conviction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 刑事冤案指的是在有罪或无罪这一根本的定性问题上出现错误的案件。刑事冤案的产生不仅严重损害司法的公正性和权威性,而且对具体案件中的当事人来说,个人的身心健康、名誉、求学就业、发展前途及其家庭都会产生巨大的影响。造成刑事冤案的原因很多,但通过树立无罪推定的现代司法理念、改革侦查制度、改革刑事辩护制度、完善证据制度和改革司法鉴定制度等多种措施,可以有效避免、减少冤案的发生。 The meanings of the wrongful conviction are the basic attribute which distinguishes the guilty or not guilty.The wrongful conviction is not only to injure the judicial fair seriously,but also to produce enormous influence,such as personal mind and body health,reputation,attend school,employment,development prospect and its family.In despite of many reasons causing the wrongful conviction,we can reduce it through setting up modern judicial principle,reforming investigate the system,reforming vindication system,perfecting proof system,reforming the judicatory authentication system etc.
作者 庄琳
出处 《河南公安高等专科学校学报》 2010年第4期59-62,共4页 Journal of Henan Public Security Academy
基金 江苏省教育厅立项课题<刑事证据制度和立法比较研究>(08SDJ8200032)的阶段性成果
关键词 刑事冤案 证据制度 刑事辩护制度 The wrongful conviction Evidence system Criminal defense system
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1[美]赖茨曼.司法心理学[M].吴宗宪等译.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2004.143-145.
  • 2Stablay. A Meta- Analytic Review of the Weapon Focus Effect. Law and Human Behavior, Vol. 16, No. 4, 1992. 413 - 424.
  • 3Elizabeth F. Loftus. Eyewitness Testimony, Harvard University Press, 1979. 55.
  • 4张泽涛.目击者指证规则中的若干问题[J].环球法律评论,2005,27(1):97-107. 被引量:10
  • 5C. Ronald Huff. Wrongful Convictions: The American Experience. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, January 2004. 113 - 116.
  • 6[英]道格拉斯·W·贝斯黑莱姆.偏见心理学[M].邹海燕,郑佳明译.长沙:湖南人民出版社,1989.5.
  • 7陈光中.联合国刑事司法准则与中国法制[M].北京:法律出版社,1998.110.
  • 8中国政法大学刑事法律研究中心.英国刑事诉讼法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001..

二级参考文献50

  • 1龙宗智 衡静.《直觉在证据判断中的作用》[A]..《证据学论丛》第二卷[C].中国检察出版社,2001年版..
  • 2张泽涛.《证人出庭的现状分析与对策探讨》[A].何家弘.《证据学论坛》第2卷[C].中国检察出版社,2001年版.第486-498页.
  • 3Clindy J. O' Hagan, When Seeing Is not Believing:The Case for Eyewitness Expert Testimony, 81 Geo. L. J. 741 (March, 1993).
  • 4Elizabeth F. Loftus, Impact of Expert Psychological Testimony on The Unreliability of Eyewitness Identification ,65 J. Applied Psychol. 9,9(1980).
  • 5United States v. Downing, 753 F.2d 1224,1230n. 6(3d Cir. 1985).
  • 6Ambresio A.Sliva, Criminal Law-suggestive Identification Does Not Violate Due Process If otherwise Reliable,34 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 673(2001).
  • 7United States v Amaral, 488 F.2d 1148,1153(9^th Cir. 1973).
  • 8United States v. Amaml,488 F.2d 1148,1153(9^th Cir.1973).
  • 9Generally Kenneth A. Deffenbacher & Elizabeth F. Loftus, Do Jurors Share A Common Understanding concerning Eyewitness Behavior? 6 L. & Hum. Behav. 15 (1982).
  • 10Frederic D. Woocher, Note, Did Your Eyes Deceive You? Expert Psychological Testimony on the Unreliability of Eyewitness Identification,29 Stan. L. Rev.969,1005(1977).

共引文献14

同被引文献12

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部