期刊文献+

中国上市公司高管层受教育水平与公司绩效关系再研究 被引量:9

Restudy on the Relationship between Educational Level and Performance of Senior Management of Listed Companies in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以沪深两市发行的全部A股上市公司为样本,采用SPSS15.0统计分析软件,将每股收益作为上市公司业绩评价的主要指标,对全部上市公司高管层受教育程度和公司绩效进行相关分析。结果表明,除仪电仪表与煤炭石油行业呈正相关外,中国上市公司高管层的受教育水平与公司的经营业绩不相关;再进一步对仪电仪表与煤炭石油板块高管层受教育水平与企业效益的关系通过典型性相关分析发现,在这两大具有垄断特征的行业中,高管层中的博士与硕士学历构成成为影响企业绩效的主要因素。 This paper taken listed companies who issue A shares in Shanghai and Shenzhen as samples, used SPSS15.0 statistical analysis software, taken EPS as the primary performance evaluation indicators, and made a correlation analysis on the educational level of senior management and company performance in all of the listed com- panies. Except for the positive correlation between instrument-electric and oil and coal industry, the result showed that there is not relevant between educational level of senior management and the company's operating results. Then through the typical correlation analysis, we have the further research to the relationship between educational level of senior management and company's benefit in instrument-electric and oil and coal industry, and further reveals that in these two sectors with monopoly characteristics, the compositions of PhD and master's degree in senior manage- ment have become the primary factors affectinz business performance.
作者 刘泽双
出处 《经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第8期73-79,共7页 Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )
基金 国家社科基金"技术的溢出效应与区域经济发展"(09BJL061) 陕西省软科学基金项目"基于自主创新的企业发挥人才效用的机制研究"(2006KR016)
关键词 高管层 每股收益 经营绩效 教育水平 executive earnings per share operation performance educational level
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献49

  • 1於世为,诸克军,黎金玲.我国各地区人力资本投入计量实证研究[J].科技与管理,2005,7(1):105-107. 被引量:3
  • 2诸克军,苏顺华,黎金玲.模糊C-均值中的最优聚类与最佳聚类数[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(3):52-61. 被引量:69
  • 3[1]Chandler A D. Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American enterprise [ M ]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1962.
  • 4[2]Roberts E B. Entrepreneurs in high technology:Lessons from MIT and beyond[M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 1991.
  • 5[3]Schrader S. Spitzenfuehrungskraefte, Unternehmensstrategie und Unternehmenserfolg[ M]. Tuebingen: Mohr/Siebeck, 1995.
  • 6[4]Harhoff D. Innovation objectives, managerial education and firm performance-an exploratory analysis[ J]. The dynamics of innovation.1999 Springer.
  • 7[5]Miles R E, Snow C C. Organizational strategy, structure and process[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
  • 8[6]Utterback J M, Abemathy W J. A dynamic model of process and product innovation[J]. Omega,1975,3:639 ~ 656.
  • 9[1]Barro R,Lee J W.International measures of schooling years and schooling quality[J].American Economic Review,1996,86:218-223.
  • 10[2]Barro R,Lee J W.International data on education attainment:updates and implications[M].Oxford Economic Papers,2001(3):541-563.

共引文献89

同被引文献177

引证文献9

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部