期刊文献+

Factors Influencing Migrant Workers’ Employment and Earnings——The Role of Education and Training 被引量:23

农民工的就业与工资决定:教育与培训的重要性(英文)
原文传递
导出
摘要 In the urban labor market, the rural labor force can choose whether to become self- employed or work for wages depending on their stock of human capital and local labor market conditions. A simple Mincer earnings regression shows that the rate of return to schooling for wage earners is two percentage points higher than that for the self-employed. After correcting for bias in sample selection, the expanded Mincer earnings equation estimated the rate of return to schooling for wage earners at between 5.3 and 6.8 percent. From the standpoint of training, we found that the simplest form of training, short-term training and formal training played an important role in promoting migrant workers’ repeat mobility. However, the simplest form of training did not have a significant effect on earnings,whereas short-term and formal training played an important determining role in this respect. Moreover, rights protection issues such as wage arrears also had an important effect on migrant workers’ repeat mobility. In handling heterogeneity and endogenous educational variables among migrant workers, the authors found that the years of schooling of the parents of migrant workers were not an ideal instrumental variable. 在城市劳动力市场上,农村劳动力根据个人的人力资本积累状况和当地的劳动力市场条件,在成为自我经营者和工资收入者之间进行就业选择。简单的Mincer工资方程回归结果显示,工资收入者比自我经营者的教育回报率高出2个百分点左右。在矫正了样本选择偏差之后,拓展的Mincer工资方程对工资收入者的教育回报率估计结果在5.3%-6.8%之间。从培训角度看,简单培训、短期培训和正规培训对农民工再流动都有显著作用,但简单培训对农民工的工资收入作用不显著,而短期培训和正规培训则对其工资收入有着重要的决定作用。此外,工资拖欠等权益保护问题也对农村劳动力再流动有重要影响。在处理农民工的个人异质性和教育内生性问题时,本文还发现父母受教育年限不是一个理想工具变量。
出处 《Social Sciences in China》 2010年第3期123-145,共23页 中国社会科学(英文版)
关键词 migrant workers employment choices repeat mobility rate of return to education and training treatment effects modely 农民工 就业选择 再流动 教育与培训的回报率 处理效应模型
  • 相关文献

参考文献58

  • 1Altonji, J. and Thomas A. Dunn. "The Effects of Family Characteristics on the Returns to Education." Review of Ecomonics and Statistics, vol. 78, 1996, no. 4.
  • 2Byron, Raymond P. and Evelyn Q. Manaloto. "Returns to Education in China." Economic Development and Cultural Change, vol. 38, 1990.
  • 3Card, D. "The Causal Effect of Education on Earnings." In Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. IIIA., eds. O.C. Ashenfelter and D. Card. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1999.
  • 4Cameiro, E, James. J. Heckman and E. Vytlacil. "Understanding What Instrumental Variables Estimate: Estimating Marginal and Average Returns to Education." Mimeo, 2003.
  • 5Chen Xiaoyu ChenLiangkunandXiaChen."Evolution and Implications of Returns to Schooling in China’s Urban Areas in the 1990s"(20世纪90年代中国城镇教育收益率的变化与启示)[J].北京大学教育评论,2003,2.
  • 6Connelly, Karen and Roope Uusitalo. "Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in the Becker Schooling Model." Mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Helsinki, 1999.
  • 7de Brauw, Alan and Scott Rozelle. "Reconciling the Returns to Education in Off-farm Wage Employment in Rural China." Working Paper, Department of Economics, Williams College, WiUiamstown, MA 01267, 2006.
  • 8Fields, G. S. "Rural-Urban Migration, Urban Unemployment and Underemployment, and Job-Search Activity in LDCs." Journal of Development Economics, vol. 2, 1974, no. 2.
  • 9Green, W.H. Econometric Analysis. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 2000.
  • 10Griliches, Zvi. "Estimating Returns to Schooling: Some Econometric Problems." Econometrica, vol. 45, 1977, no. 1.

同被引文献506

引证文献23

二级引证文献384

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部