期刊文献+

3-5岁儿童意图状态推理中的偏差现象

The Curse of Intention Reasoning in 3-to 5-year Children
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以判断正误的得分和原因解释的得分作为测量指标,以90名儿童为被试,采用意图冲突推理任务来考察3-5岁儿童对意图状态推理的偏差。结果表明在意图冲突推理任务中,与自己打算去做某事的情况相比,儿童在自己不打算去做某事的条件下更容易正确推理他人的意图,表现出了推理偏差。此结果支持了表征不可通达假设。 The current study investigated the status of intention reasoning based on 90 children (aged 3 to 5 years) within the context of conflicting intention reasoning tasks. We used the scores of children's judgments and the ones of the explanations as the indexes of their performances. Compared with the condition of self-planning to do something, children could more accurately reason other's intention with the condition of not self-planning to do something. It was showed that children's reasoning about other's intention experienced asymmetry curse. These results supported the hypothesis that "representation is not to be attached".
作者 李晶 刘希平
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第4期955-958,共4页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究项目基金资助(09YJAXLX021) 天津市教育科学十一五规划重点项目(ZGG187)的资助
关键词 心理理论 意图推理 偏差 theory of mind, intention reasoning, curse
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1F.H Flavell, P. H Miller, S. A Miller. Deng ci - ping, Liu Ming translated. Cognitive development. East China Normal University Publication, 2002, 7 : 250 - 282.
  • 2Feinfield K A. , Lee P P. , Flavell E R. , Green F L. , Flavell J H. Young children ' s understanding of intention. Cognitive Development, 1999, 14:463 486.
  • 3Astington, J. W., Lee, E. What do children know about intentional causation? Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA, 1991.
  • 4Premack, D. The infant's theory of self propelled objects. Cognition, 1990, 36: 116.
  • 5Baldwin, D. Early referential understanding: infants' ability to recognize referential acts for what they are. Developmental Psychology, 1993, 29:832 - 843.
  • 6Spelke, E. S., Pillips A., et al. Infants' knowledge of object motion and human action. In: D. Sperber, D. Premack, A.J. Rremack (Eds.). Causal cognition: A muhidisciplinary, debate. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995:44-78.
  • 7Csibra. G. Goal attribution without agency cues: the perception of "pure reason" in infancy. Cognition, 1999, 72: 237-267.
  • 8Smith M C. Cognizing the behavior stream: The recognition of in2tentional action. Child Development, 1978, 49: 736-743.
  • 9Shuhz. Explaining human movements and actions: Children's understanding of the limits of psychological explanation. Cognition, 1997, 62:291-324.
  • 10Csibra, G., Gergely, G. The teleological origins of mentalistic aclion explanations: a developmental hypothesis. Developmental Science, 199g. 1:255-259.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部