期刊文献+

公平过程效应和结果公平效应的实证分析 被引量:9

An Empirical Analysis of the Fair Process Effect and the Outcome Fair Effect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对143位大学生的数据分析,文章探讨了公平过程效应和结果公平效应存在的条件以及在不同条件下人们对结果公平和结果满意度的反应。多元方差分析结果表明:在不知道他人结果的情况下,公平过程效应显著;在知道他人结果的条件下,结果公平效应显著。此外,研究还表明,人们对结果满意度和结果公平反应是不同的,在结果满意度上,得到多于他人结果的个体比得到少于他人结果的个体判断自己的结果更为满意,但是在结果公平判断上,二者不存在显著差异。 The article explored the conditions of the Fair Process Effect and the Outcome Fair Effect by analyzing the data of 143 undergraduates. MANOVA showed that the fair process effect is salient when people don't know the outcomes of others, but when they know the outcomes of others, the outcome fair effect becomes salient. Furthermore, the research indicated that the effects on perceived outcome satisfaction and outcome fairnexs are different. A person who receives an outcome that is more than the outcome of the other person is more satisfied; however, people who receivec an outcome that is more or less than the outcome of another person are not differ in their outcome fairness judgments.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第4期966-968,共3页 Journal of Psychological Science
关键词 程序公平 公平过程效应 结果公平效应 Procedural justice, Fair Process Effect, Outcome Fair Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Adams, J. S. Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental .social psychology, 1965, 2:267 - 299).
  • 2Thibaut, J., Walker, L. Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. 1975. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • 3Greenberg, J. Determinants of procedural fairness in performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1986, 71:340-342.
  • 4Tyler, Tom R. ; Caine, Andrew. The influence of outcomes and procedures on .satisfaction with formal leaders. Journal of Personality and .Social Psychology, 1981, 41 : 642 - 655.
  • 5LaTour, Stephcn. Determinations of participant and observer ,satisfaction with adversary and inquisitorial modes of adjudication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, 36:1531-1545.
  • 6William D. Anderson, Miles L. Patterson. Effects of Social Value Orientations on Fairness Judgments. The Journal of Social Psychology, 2008, 148: 223- 245.
  • 7Tyler, T. R. , & Lind, E. A. , A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1992, 25: 115-191.
  • 8Treena L. Gillespie, Richard O. Parry. Fuel for Litigation? Links between Procedural Justice and Multisource Feedback. Journal of managerial issuea, 2006, 9:530-546.
  • 9Brocker, J. , & wiesenfeld, B. M.. how, when , and why does outcome favorahility interact with procedural fairness? In J, Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds), Handbook of organizational justice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbanm, 2005, 525 553.
  • 10Joel Brockner and Ariel Y. Fishman, Jochen Reb, Barry Goldman, Scott Spiegel, Charlee Garden. Procedural Fairness, Outcome Favorability, and Judgments of an Authority' s Responsibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 92:1657- 1671.

同被引文献73

引证文献9

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部