摘要
关于侦查思维特征问题的探究,目前国内学者有许多不同观点。而当学者们提出某一观点的时候,往往又是在批评或者否定其他观点的情况下提出来的。这就走入一个误区,即想用若干个思维特征来规范侦查思维的特征。这不符合唯物辩证法关于事物共性与个性、相对性与绝对性关系的原理。侦查思维特征属于思维的个性特征,而个性特征都是事物的相对特征(即具有相对性),它没有一种绝对的、固定不变的定律或模式。因此,当人们在探讨侦查思维特征的问题时,不应当寻求一种标准化的、统一的模式,而应当允许有各种不同的说法或观点。
At present there exit different opinions among scholars as to investigation thinking features. When some scholars put forward an idea, this idea is often based on criticizing or denying other' s idea. Misunderstanding arises when scholars use several thinking features to define investigation thinking features. Investigation thinking features are unique to some extent. Unique features have the character of relativity and have no definite, rigid model. Therefore, when talking about investigation thinking features, people should not seek a standardized, unified model. They should accept different ideas or opinions.
出处
《政法学刊》
2010年第3期86-89,共4页
Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词
侦查思维
特征
多样性
相对性
investigation thinking feature
variety
relativity