期刊文献+

炎琥宁注射液治疗小儿手足口病的疗效分析 被引量:3

Curative effect of the treatment with yanhuning injection on children with hand,foot and mouth disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨炎琥宁注射液治疗小儿手足口病的疗效及不良反应。方法选择手足口病患者116例,随机分成两组。对照组58例静滴利巴韦林15 mg/(kg·d),治疗组58例静滴炎琥宁注射液10mg/(kg·d),疗程5d,疗程结束时比较两组疗效及不良反应。结果治疗组在退热时间、口腔疼痛消失时间、皮疹消退时间等方面均短于对照组,两组差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组总有效率96.55%,对照组82.76%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组出现8例不良反应,治疗组发现1例不良反应,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论炎琥宁注射液治疗小儿手足口病可明显改善症状、提高疗效,且用药相对安全,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To explore the curative effect and adverse reactions for the treatment with yanhuning injection on children with hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD). Methods 116 patients with HFMD were divided into the control group (n=58) and the treatment group (n=58). The control group were treated with ribavirin 15 mg/(kg·d) by intravenous drip, while the treatment group were treated with yanhun- ing injection 10 mg/(kg·d) by the same method. The course was 5 days. The curative effect and adverse reactions for the two groups were compared in the end of treatment. Results Fever time, oral pain time and rash dissipated time in the treatment group were shorter than those in the control group with significant difference between the two groups (P〈0.05). The total effective rate was 96.55% in the treatment group and 82.76% in the control group, with significant difference (P〈0.05). Eight cases in the control group occurred adverse reactions while one case with adverse reaction was found in the treatment group, with significant difference between the two groups (P〈0.05). Conclusion Symptoms and the curative effect can be improved significantly by the treatment with yanhuning injection on HFMD, which is relatively safety and worthy of clinical applicadon.
出处 《热带病与寄生虫学》 2010年第1期11-12,21,共3页 Journal of Tropical Diseases and Parasitology
关键词 炎琥宁注射液 手足口病 疗效 Yanhuning injection, Hand-foot-mouth disease, Curative effect
  • 相关文献

同被引文献93

  • 1刘艳霞,马海燕.浅析炎琥宁注射液治疗小儿手足口病[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(4):400-401. 被引量:1
  • 2郭倩梅.炎琥宁治疗小儿手足口病40例[J].中国实用医刊,2010,37(17):88-88. 被引量:3
  • 3刘利容,吴涛,詹思延,吴晔,郭晓昕.利巴韦林的安全性和有效性——Meta分析结果的系统综述[J].药物不良反应杂志,2006,8(3):184-187. 被引量:15
  • 4吕为萍,李建友.炎琥宁治疗手足口病250例疗效观察[J].实用医技杂志,2006,13(17):3026-3027. 被引量:10
  • 5彭安民 张旭.炎琥宁与利巴韦林治疗手足口病效果比较.医药与保健,17(9):100-101.
  • 6Ooi MH, Wong SC, Mohan A, et al. Identification and validation of clinical Predictors for the risk of neurological involvement in children with hand, Foot, and mouth disease in Sarawak [ J ]. BMC Infect Dis, 2009,9( 1 ) :3.
  • 7Wang SM, Lei HY, Huang K.I, et al. Pathogenesis of enterovirus 71 brainstem encephalitis in pediatric patients : roles of cytokines and cel- lular immune activation in patients with pulmonary edema[ J]. J Infect Dis ,2003,188 (4) :564-570.
  • 8卫生部.《手足口病诊疗指南(2010年版)》.(2010-04-21)[2011-07-20].http://www.moh.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/mohyzs/s3586/201004/46884.htm.
  • 9胡亚美 江载芳.诸福棠实用儿科学[M]第7版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002.1514.
  • 10臧振芳.手足口病140例临床分析[J].医药前沿,2012,10(2):102.

引证文献3

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部