期刊文献+

有机质四种检测方法的比较及影响因素研究 被引量:15

A Comparison among Four Test Methods for Organic Matter and Its Influence Factors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以不同种类有机物为对象,分别用灼烧法、国标GB18877-2002、行标NY/T525-2002及油浴法检测,比较不同检测方法所得有机质含量的差异及检测影响因素。结果表明:不同有机肥的氧化校正系数不同,由有机肥所含还原物质的多少和氧化难易程度共同决定;油浴法和NY/T525-2002法有机质氧化温度较高,氧化较彻底,与灼烧法比较,校正系数值为1.25~1.37;GB18877-2002法水浴温度较低,氧化效果相对要差,与灼烧法比较,校正系数值1.23~1.45;含氯化肥,尤其是氯化铵对有机质检测结果影响较大。 In order to find out the difference of organic matter contents from different test methods and influencing factor for these test methods, the burning method, the national standard (GB18877-2002), the Industry Standard (NY/ T525-2002) and oil bath assay were used for test different types of organic matter, respectively. The results indicated that the oxidation correction coefficient of different organic fertilizer is different, which is determined by the content of reducing matter in organic fertilizer and the difficulty of oxidation; in comparison with burning method, the oil bath assay and NY/T525-2002 method have higher oxidation temperature and more complete oxidation with 1.25~1.37 of correction coefficient; in comparison with burning method, the GB18877-2002 method has lower bath temperature and worse oxidation effect with 1.23 ~1.45 of correction coefficient. The chlorine-containing fertilizers, especially ammonium chloride have large impact on test results.
出处 《湖南农业科学》 2010年第7期81-83,86,共4页 Hunan Agricultural Sciences
关键词 有机肥 有机无机复混肥 有机质 检测方法 影响因素 organic fertilizer organic-inorganic compound fertilizer organic matter test method influencing factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献15

  • 1魏自民,席北斗,赵越,王世平,刘鸿亮.生活垃圾微生物堆肥水溶性有机物光谱特性研究[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2007,27(4):735-738. 被引量:22
  • 2Gigliotti G, Macchioni A, Zuccaccia C, et al. A spectroscopic study of fulvic acid composition after six-year applications of urban waste compost[J]. Agronomie, 2003, 23: 719-724.
  • 3于会泳.有机肥系统工艺参数及变化规律研究[L].北京:中国农业大学,2003.
  • 4Muller W, Fricke K, Vogtmann H. Biodegradation of organic matter during mechanical biological treatment[J]. Compost Science and Utilization, 1998, 6(3): 42-52.
  • 5Sehnitzer M, Dinel H, Mathur S P, et al. Determination of compost biomaturity. Ⅲ. Evaluation of a colorimetric test by 13 (C)-NMR spectroscopy and pyrolysis-field ionization mass spectrometry[J]. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture, 1993, 10(2): 109-123.
  • 6Smidt E, Lechner P. State And Stability of Organic Matter in Landfills And Composting Processes, Their Characterization by FT-IR-Spectroscopy. In: Spanish Waste Club, ORBIT ASsociation, Sevilla (Ed.): Proc, International Conference ORBIT 2001 on Biological Processing of Waste: a product-oriented perspective, Part Ⅰ, 2001. 167.
  • 7Campitelli P A, Velasco M I, Ceppi S B. Charge development and acid-base characteristics of soil and compost humic acids [J]. Journal of the Chilean Chemical Society, 2003,48(3 ): 91-96.
  • 8国家环保局.水和废水监测分析方法(第4版)[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002..
  • 9李勇,李良华,梅书棋,宋忠旭.利用堆肥化技术对规模化猪场猪粪无害化处理的研究[J].湖北畜牧兽医,2007,28(12):8-9. 被引量:4
  • 10高德树,高根树,王锦芳.城市生活垃圾堆肥处理工程技术发展探讨[J].中国环保产业,2007(12):46-48. 被引量:4

共引文献12

同被引文献108

引证文献15

二级引证文献94

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部