层流手术室两种空气质量检测方法的比较

Comparision of Two Air Quality Testing Methods of Laminar Flow Operation Room

目的比较《医药工业洁净室(区)沉降菌的测试方法》(A法)和《医院消毒卫生分区域多点布控法》(B法)两种空气质量检测方法对层流手术室的检测效果。方法采用A与B两种方法对层流手术室进行空气质量检测,比较其检测合格率、复检合格率及两种方法的灵敏度。结果 B法比A法检测合格率高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);对于检测不合格的手术室采用两种方法复检所得合格率的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论分区域多点布控法是较为合理和科学的手术室空气质量检测方法,但仍存在一定的问题,有待于进一步改进。

Objective To compare the air quality testing effects of operation rooms of ＂National Institute of Standards Pharmaceutical Industry Clean Room（area） Precipitating Bacterial Testing Methods＂（method A）and ＂Standards of Hospital Disinfection of Sub-regional Multi-dispatched Method＂（method B）. Methods The air quality of operation rooms were tested with the two air quality testing methods and the qualified rates of the first test and retest,sensitivity were compared accordingly. Results Compared to method A, the qualified rate of method B was significantly higher（P〈0.05）. No significant difference were observed in the qualified rates of retest with the two air quality testing methods of unqualified operation rooms（P〉 0.05）. Conclusion The sub-regional multi-dispatched method is a more favorable and scientific testing method, but there are still certain problems to be improved.