期刊文献+

用于项目生成的认知模型的构建与比较——以矩阵完成问题为例 被引量:2

The Construction and Compares of Cognitive Models for Item Generation——Taking the Matrix Completion Problems for Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 项目生成是一种新的测验编制技术,它可以弥补传统测验编制技术的缺陷。使用该技术编制测验,要进行大量的前期工作,如必须要了解和归纳所编测验中项目的所有刺激特征,据此建立认知模型,再将认知模型与心理计量模型联合,构建能预测新生成项目难度的数学模型等。该研究以矩阵完成问题为例,在带约束的两参数Logistic模型的基础上,通过对构建的几个认知模型的比较,挑选合适的认知模型为矩阵完成问题的项目生成研究服务。研究结果表明,自建的认知模型能够满足矩阵问题项目生成的要求。 Item generation is a new test construction technology,which can make up for the technical defects of the traditional test construction. To use this technology to construct test,it is necessary to do a lot of preparatory work,such as the need to understand and summarize all stimulus characteristics of the items in test,to establish cognitive models accordingly,then to building mathematical models which can predict the difficulty of each generated item by unifying cognitive models with psychometric ones,and so on. Taking the Matrix Completion Problems for example,the research would serve to generate items,by comparing cognitive models to select a suitable one,on the basis of the 2PL - constrained model. The results showed that the self - built cognitive model could meet the requirements of the item generation of Matrix Completion Problems.
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 2010年第3期56-62,共7页 Psychological Exploration
基金 全国教育考试"十一五"科研规划课题(2006JKS3057) 江西师范大学博士启动基金项目
关键词 项目生成 认知模型 带约束的两参数Logistic模型 item generation cognitive model 2PL - constrained model
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Bejar I I.Generative testing:From conception to implementation.In:Irvine S H,kyllonen P C.Eds.Item generation for test development.Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbanm,2002:199-2182.
  • 2Bennett R E.Using new technology to improve assessment Educational Measurement:Issues and Practice,1999,18(3):5-12.
  • 3Hambleton R K.Theory,methods,and practices in testing for the 21st century.Psicothema,2004,16(4):696-701.
  • 4Carpenter P A,Just M,Shell P.What one intelligence test measures:A theoretical account of processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test.Psychological Review,1990,97:404-431.
  • 5Embretson S,Yang X.Automatic item generation and cognitive psychology.In:Rao C R,Sinharay S.Eds.Handbook of Statisitics:Psychometrics.Elsevier,2007,26:747-768.
  • 6Embretson S E.A cognitive design system approach to generating valid test:Application to abstract reasoning.Psychological Methods,1998,3(3):380-396.
  • 7Embretson S E.Cognitive test design systems:Application to abstract reasoning.Paper presented at the 1995 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.San Francisco,CA,1995.
  • 8Embretson S E.The role of working memory capacity and general control processes in intelligence.Intelligence,1995,20:169-189.
  • 9Embretson S E.Generating items during testing:psychometric issues and models.Psychometrika,1999,64(4):407-433.
  • 10Embretson S E.Construct validity:Construct representation versus nomotbetic span.Psychological Bulletin,1983,93:179-197.

二级参考文献17

  • 1张阔,胡竹菁.略论智力测验发展的现状与趋势[J].心理学探新,2002,22(2):36-40. 被引量:10
  • 2Alderton D L, Larson G E. Dimensionality of Raven' s Advanced Progressive Matrices items.Educational and Psychological Mea- surement, 1990,50: 877 - 900.
  • 3Bejar I I. A generative analysis of a three - dimensional spatial task. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1990, 14 ( 3 ) : 237 - 245.
  • 4Bejar I I.Generative response modeling: Leveraging the computer as a test delivery medium (ETS Research Report).Princeton, NJ: Enducational Testing Service, 1996.
  • 5Carroll J B.Maxwell S. Individual difference in ability. Annual Review of Psychology, 1979,30:603 - 640.
  • 6Enmbretson S E.Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 1983, 93 : 179 - 197.
  • 7Embretson S E.Processes in abstract reasoning: A test of the Carpenter, Just, Shell theory. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas, Lawrence, 1993a.
  • 8Embretson S E. Psychometric models for learning and cognitive processes. In: N. Frederiksen, R.J. Mislevy I I Bejar, Eds.Test theory for a new generation of tests. Hitlsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993b. 125 - 150.
  • 9Embretson S E. Applications of cognitive design systems to test development. In: C.R.Reynolds, FA.Cognitive assessment: A muhidisciplinary perspective. New York, NY: Plenium Press, 1994. 107 - 135.
  • 10Embretson S E. Developments toward a cognitive design system for psychological tests. In: D. Lubinsky, R. Dawes, Eds. Assessing individual differences in human behavior: New concepts, methods, and findings. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press, 1995.

共引文献16

同被引文献16

  • 1Hu L, Bentler PM. Fit indeices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 1998, 3:424-453.
  • 2Embretson SE. A multidimensional latent trait model for measuring learning and change. Psychometrika, 1991, 56(3): 495-515.
  • 3Embretson SE. Toward development of a psychometric ap- proach. In Carol SL. Dynamic Assessment: An iteractional approach to evaluating learning potential. The Guilford Press. NewYork and London, 1987. 141-161.
  • 4Cronbach LJ, Furby L. How should we measure change or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 1970, 74:68-80.
  • 5Embretson SE. Multidimensional measurement from dynamic tests: Abstract reasoning under stress. Multivariate Behavi- oral Research, 2000, 35(4): 505-542.
  • 6Embretson SE. A cognitive design system approach to gen- erating valid tests: Application to abstract reasoning. Psy- chological Methods, 1998,3(3): 380-396.
  • 7Embretson SE. Generating items during testing: Psychomet- ric issues and models. Psychometrika, 1999, 64(4): 407-433.
  • 8Embretson SE, Yang XD. Automatic item generation and cognitive psychology. Handbook of statistics, 2007, 26: 47- 766.
  • 9Carpenter PA, Just MA, Shell P. What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the raven progressive matrices test. Psychological Review, 1990, 4(3): 404-443.
  • 10Embretson SE. Cognitive test design systems: Application to abstract reasoning. Paper presented at the 1995 annual meeting of the American Education Research Association. April, San Francisco, CA, 1995.

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部