摘要
因和解内涵的理解差异,刑事和解案件范围在立法、司法与学界存在严重分歧。刑事和解案件范围的确定应当立足于刑事和解内涵的重新厘定以及刑事和解与刑事政策在案件处理方面的差别。当刑事和解建立在当事人双方达成谅解而致起诉权的放弃与加害人刑事可罚性降低的前提下,它只能适用于存在被害人的自诉案件与公诉案件,而且,应当遵循宪法原则、平等原则下的差别原则及公序良俗确定其中的个罪能否和解。
There are severe divergence about the scope of criminal reconciliation cases in legislation, judicature and academia because ofdifferent understanding about the connotation of reconciliation. The confirming of the scope of criminal reconciliation cases should base on the recognizanceof criminal reconciliation, and the differences of criminal reconciliation and criminal policy in dealing with cases. Under the premisesthat the parties reach forgiveness so that the suit right is given up and the inflictor's criminal penalty is reduced, it only can be used in voluntaryprosecution of the initiator and public prosecution, what's more, we should abide by constitutional principle, difference principle under equalprinciple, and whether the individual case can be reconciled which confirmed by public order and good custom.
出处
《贵州警官职业学院学报》
2010年第3期5-11,共7页
Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College
关键词
刑事和解
和解内涵
刑事政策
criminal reconciliation
connotation of reconciliation
criminal policy