摘要
目的:探讨LEEP联合保妇康栓治疗宫颈糜烂的临床疗效。方法:106例宫颈糜烂患者随机分为对照组(51例)与治疗组(55例),其中对照组采用LEEP治疗,治疗组采用LEEP联合保妇康栓治疗。观察比较两组疗效、阴道排液、术后出血和创面愈合情况。结果:治疗组阴道排液量、术后出血时间、出血例数及创面愈合时间与对照组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01);治疗组总有效率与对照组无差异(P>0.05),但92.7%的治愈率显著高于对照组78.4%的治愈率,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:LEEP联合保妇康栓治疗宫颈糜烂疗效显著,优于单独LEEP治疗。
Objective:To explore the clinical efficacy of LEEP (Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure) combined with Baofukang suppository in the treatment of cervical erosion.Methods:106 cases with cervical erosion were randomly divided into treatment group (55 cases) and control group (51 cases).The control group was treated with LEEP, and the treatment group was treated with LEEP joint Baofukang suppository.The clinical effect, vaginal apocenosis and bleeding, and wound surface healing were evaluated and analyzed.Results:The volume of vaginal apocenosis, the number of vaginal bleeding days, the vaginal bleeding cases, and the wound surface healing time in the treatment group was all less than the control group (P0.05 or 0.01); There was no significant difference in the total effective rates between the treatment group and the control group (P0.05), but the cure rate of the treatment group (92.7%) was better than the control group (78.4%), and There was significant difference between them (P0.05).Conclusion:The combination of LEEP and Baofukang suppository has a good effect in treating cervical erosion, and it deserved clinical application.
出处
《现代生物医学进展》
CAS
2010年第14期2690-2692,共3页
Progress in Modern Biomedicine
关键词
LEEP
宫颈糜烂
保妇康
LEEP
cervical erosion
Baofukang suppository