3Ter Meulen RH,Limiting Solidarity in the Netherlands:a Two- tier, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy , 1995 , 20(6) :607-616.
4Calltorp,J. Priority Setting in Health Policy in Swedenand a Comparison with Norway, Health Policy, 1999,(50):1-22.
5Swedish Parliamentary Priorities Commission, Prioritiesin Health Care. Stockholm: Ministry of Health and SocialAffairs, 1995.
6Resolving Health Care,s Difficult Choices:Survey of Prio-rity Setting in Sweden and an Analysis of Principles and Guidelineson Priorities in Health Care. National Centre for Priority Setting inHealth Care, 2007.
7National Advisory Committee on Core Health and Disa-bility Support Services,Core Services for 1993 - 94,First Report tothe Minister of Health. Wellington; National Advisory Committeeon Core Health and Disability Support Services,1992.
8Norheim. O. Limiting Access to Health Care : A Cont-ractualist Approach to Fair Rationing. Oslo : Oslo UniversityPress, 2003, pp. 58 -79.
9Sabik, L. M.,Lie, R. K. Priority Setting in HealthCare: Lessons from the Experiences of Eight Countries, Interna-tional Journal for Equity in Health,2008,(7) : 4.
10S Edgar W. Rationing Health Care in New Zealand -How the Public Has a Say. In: Coulter A, Ham C,editors. TheGlobal Challenge of Healthcare Rationing. Philadelphia: Open U-niversity Press, 2000 , pp. 175 - 91.
