期刊文献+

城市地震的可接受死亡风险研究 被引量:4

Research on acceptable casualty risk level for earthquake disasters in cities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 可接受的风险水平是风险管理科学的一个重要内容。应用F-N曲线和ALARP准则研究了有关城市地震人员伤亡的可接受风险决策问题,结合其他各类自然和人为灾害所造成的人员伤亡的实际情况,以及相关领域专家的咨询意见,建议了社会可接受的地震生命风险标准。 This paper presents the study on the acceptable risk level for city' s ability in reducing earthquake disasters. The so-called acceptable risk level refers to the threshold of the safety level based on the risk analysis and assessment. The paper mainly defines the acceptable risk levels for the corresponding risk - prevention measures, including failure probability and the consequences of measure failure, such as human casualty and economic loss, etc. In more detailed way, the paper discusseds the methods to use ALARP principle and F - N curve so as to determine the acceptable risk and their applications to the city' s ability in reducing earthquake disasters. However, it remains a controversial issue to make accurate assessment of the acceptable risk level in the actual situations, which is still left to be solved through the joint efforts of the governmental departments, engineers, scholars and the public concerned.
出处 《自然灾害学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第4期1-7,共7页 Journal of Natural Disasters
基金 山东省地震局博士生基金 地震科学联合基金(编号C07025)
关键词 风险管理 可接受风险 F—N曲线 ALARP准则 risk management acceptable risk level F- N curve ALARP principle
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1肖义,郭生练,熊立华,雒征.大坝安全评价的可接受风险研究与评述[J].安全与环境学报,2005,5(3):90-94. 被引量:39
  • 2Jonkman S N, Gelder van P H A J M, Vrijling J K. An overview of quantitative risk measures for loss of life and economic damage [ J ]. Journal of hazardous Material, 2003, 99 ( 1 ) : 1 - 30.
  • 3Salmon G M, Hartford D N D. Risk analysis for dam safety [ J ]. International Water Power and Dam Construction, 1995,47 ( 3 ) :42 - 47 ; 1995,47 (4) :38 -39.
  • 4Vrijling J K, Hengel van W. A framework for risk evaluation [ J]. Journal of Hazardous Material, 1995, 43 (3) :245 -261.
  • 5中国可持续发展信息网(http://www.sdinfo.net.cn)中的自然灾害研究组:http://210.72.100.6/.
  • 6The Society for Earthquake and Civil Engineering Dynamics : Newsletter( 1997 - 2004 ). http ://www. ice. org. uk/ice/public/pubindex, html.
  • 7丁厚成,万成略.风险评价标准值初探[J].工业安全与环保,2004,30(10):45-47. 被引量:31
  • 8刘茂.城镇公共安全规划编制要点和规划目标的研究[J].江苏城市规划,2005,0(4):27-32. 被引量:4
  • 9李冬升.基于可靠度理论的边坡风险评价研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2006.
  • 10Fell R. Some landslide risk zoning schemes in use in easter. Australia and their application Sixth Australian New Zealand Conference on Geomechanics [ J ]. Christchurch, 1992, 505 - 512.

二级参考文献23

  • 1吴媚玲 王俊德.水资源工程的可靠性与风险[M].北京:水利电力出版社,1993..
  • 2Berga L. New trends in hydrological safety[A]. In: Dam Safety [M]. Rotterdam: Balkema, 1998. 1099~1116.
  • 3DEFRA. Flood and Reservoir Safety Integration [R]. Final report. http:∥www. defra. gov. uk/environment/water.August, 2002.
  • 4Faber M H and Stewart M G. Risk assessment for civil engineering facilities: critical overview and discussion [J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2003, 80 (2): 173~184.
  • 5Bottelberghs P H. Risk analysis and safety policy developments in The Netherlands[J]. Journal of Hazardous Material, 2000,71(1-3): 59~84.
  • 6Jonkman S N, van Gelder P H A J M and Vrijling J K. An overview of quantitative risk measures for loss of life and economic damage[J]. Journal of Hazardous Material, 2003,99(1): 1~30.
  • 7Marszal E M. Tolerable risk guidelines[J]. ISA Transactions,2001, 40(4): 391~399.
  • 8Salmon G M and Hartford D N D. Risk analysis for dam safety [J]. International Water Power and Dam Construction, 1995,47(3): 42~47;1995, 47(4): 38~39.
  • 9Vrijling J K and van Hengel W. A framework for risk evaluation [J]. Journal of Hazardous Material, 1995, 43 (3):245~261.
  • 10Vrijling J K, van Hengel W and Houben R J. Acceptable risk as a basis for design [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1998, 59(1): 141~150.

共引文献65

同被引文献63

引证文献4

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部