柏拉图文艺对话中的“反讽”修辞与矛盾性

The Rhetoric of Irony in the Dialogues of Plato and his Contradictions

历史上对于柏拉图哲学对话的解释可大致分为"分析学派"和"戏剧学派"。其中"戏剧学派"以利奥.斯特劳斯为代表,强调对柏拉图哲学进行反向解读,指出柏拉图的政治哲学并不是论证了理想国家的可能性,反倒是论证了它的不可能性,其中的核心策略便是对柏拉图对话中"反讽"修辞的分析。柏拉图的对话就是在对对话者进行"归谬"处理。在这个基础上对柏拉图的文艺对话中的几个重要篇目进行细读,能够对柏拉图对于文艺、诗人等问题的看法作出新解。

There are two ways to interpret the dialogues of Plato including＂school of analysis＂and＂school of drama＂.Leo Strauss,a representative of the latter,emphatically points out that the dialogues of Plato have shown the impossibility to establish the ideal re-public rather than the possibility with the key method of the rhetoric of irony.Moreover,these dialogues attempt to find paralogism of the participants.Based on this perspective,efforts will be made to make a close reading of some important chapters to find something new about Plato’s opinions of poets and other questions.