期刊文献+

美国公立大学问责:结构功能主义的分析框架 被引量:3

Accountability of Public Universities and Colleges in the United States: An Analytical Framework of Structural Functionalism
原文传递
导出
摘要 利用社会学结构功能主义的理论范式,我们解析马丁·特罗关于高等教育问责的基本问题就有了新的研究视角和理论基础。本文试图通过构建美国公立大学问责制的分析框架,讨论“价值-功能”导向下的四种问责形式,并分析问责的限度与问题。 Theoretical paradigm of structural functionalism in Sociology provides a useful perspective and theoretical basis for us to answer Martin Trow's basic questions about higher education accountability research. This article attempts to build an analytical framework to study accountability of public universities and colleges in the United States as well as evaluate the functions of this accountability system.
作者 柳亮
出处 《教育发展研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第13期5-10,共6页 Research in Educational Development
关键词 问责制 结构功能主义 公立大学 accountability, structural functionalism, public universities and colleges
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Burke,Joseph C. Achieving Accountability in Higher Education: Balancing Public, Academic, and Market Demands[C]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005. preface, X.
  • 2Trow,Martin.Trust, Markets and Accountability in Higher Education: a Comparative Perspective[J]. Higher Education Policy,1996,(9).
  • 3李捷理.简析西方社会学理论发展的若干新动态[A].李捷理.社会学[C].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.5.
  • 4[美]罗伯特·K.默顿.社会理论和社会结构[M].南京:译林出版社,2006:76-77.
  • 5[美]乔治·瑞泽尔.布莱克维尔社会理论家指南[M].凌琪,刘仲翔,王修晓,等译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2009.408,410.
  • 6Clark,Burton R. The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-national Perspective [M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.241.
  • 7Komn Maurice. Transforming Higher Education: a Comparative Study[M]. Dordrecht, Netherlands : Springer, 2006.78.
  • 8[德]乌塔·格哈特.帕森斯学术思想评传[M].李康译.北京:北京大学出版社,2009.260,253,252,264,264.
  • 9Richardson Jr.,Richard C. & Smalling Thomas R.Accountability and Governance [A]. Burke;Joseph C. Achieving Accountability in Higher Education:balancing Public, Academic, and Market Demands[C]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005.77.
  • 10Burke,Joseph C.. Reinventing Accountability: From Bureaucratic Rules to Performance Results [A]. Burke,Joseph C.Achieving accountability in Higher Education:balancing Public, Academic, and Aarket Demands[C]'. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005.231.

共引文献9

同被引文献32

  • 1柳亮.高等教育问责制:内涵、缘起与实践[J].现代教育管理,2010(2):37-40. 被引量:6
  • 2王玉衡.美国大学教学学术运动[J].清华大学教育研究,2006,27(2):84-90. 被引量:65
  • 3李捷理.简析西方社会学理论发展的若干新动态[A].李捷理.社会学[C].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.5.
  • 4[美]罗伯特·K.默顿.社会理论和社会结构[M].唐少杰,齐心,等译.南京:译林出版社,2006.265.
  • 5Easton D, Dennis J. Child in the political system [M] New York: McGraw - Hill Inc. 1969,128.
  • 6James Nolan,Jr.Lioda A.Hoover.教师督导与评价[M].兰英,译.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2007:256.
  • 7The University of Georgia Fact Book 2013 [EB/OL].http://oir. uga.edu/images/FB Covers/FactBook2013Web.pdf,[2013-11-18].
  • 8Book of Trends Cleveland State University [EB/OL].https://www. csuohio.edu/offices/iraa/bot/BOT_2013.pdf, [2013-12-21].
  • 9Fact Book Oregon University -System 2012 [EBOL].http://www. ous.edu/ sites/ default/ files/ dept/ ir /reports/ fb 2010 / 2012_Fact_Book.pdf , I[2013-11-18).
  • 10ShulinanL S. From minsk to pinsk: Why a scholarship ofteaching and learning? [J] .The Journal of Scholarship of Teachingand Learning,2000,(1).

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部