期刊文献+

经桡动脉行冠状动脉支架植入术的安全性和可行性 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较桡动脉和股动脉两种途径行冠状动脉介入治疗的优劣。评价经桡动脉途径的安全性和可行性。方法:选择我院心内科2007年6月~2008年12月行冠状动脉介入治疗的374例患者为研究对象。按动脉穿刺途径分为桡动脉组306例,股动脉组68例。观察两组间手术成功率、手术操作时间、X线曝光时间、造影剂用量、并发症和住院时间。结果:桡动脉组和股动脉组手术成功率分别为87.91%和100%(P<0.05);手术操作时间分别为(56.70±14.22)min和(44.1 2±9.30)min(P<0.05);X线曝光时间和造影剂用量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);住院时间桡动脉组少于股动脉组(P<0.05);外周血管并发症股动脉组多于桡动脉。结论:与股动脉途径相比,经桡动脉组行冠状动脉介入治疗并发症少,住院时间短,患者依从性高,是一种安全、有效的方法。
出处 《内蒙古医学杂志》 2010年第6期734-736,共3页 Inner Mongolia Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1吕树睁,陈韵岱.冠脉介入诊治技巧及器械选择[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:13.
  • 2傅向华,马宁,刘君,吴伟力,谷新顺,李世强,姜云发,屈长强,李亮,郝国桢,刘晓堃,王占启,田英平.经桡动脉与股动脉入径直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死的对比研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2003,31(8):573-577. 被引量:54
  • 3荆全民,韩雅玲,王守力,马颖艳,栾波,赵会权.老年冠心病经桡动脉穿刺介入治疗的可行性研究[J].中国实用内科杂志,2005,25(1):33-35. 被引量:20
  • 4Schofer J,Schluter,M,Gershlick AH,et al.Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of patients with long atherosclerofic lesions in small coronary arteries:double-blind,randomsed controlled trial (E-SIRIUS)[J].Lancet,2003,362:1093-1099.
  • 5Holmes DR,Leon MB,Moseaet JW,et al.Analysis of 1-year clinical outcomes in the SIRIUS trial:a randomized trial of a sirolimus-eluting stent versus a standard stent in patients at high risk for coronary restenosis[J].Circulation,2004,109:634-640.

二级参考文献19

  • 1Kim MH, Cha KS, Kim H J, et al. Primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction via the transradial approach: a safe and useful alternative to the wansfemoral approach. J Invasive Cardiol,2000,12 :292-296.
  • 2Mathias DW, Bigler L. Transradial coronary angioplasty and stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction: initial experience. J Invasive Cardiol,2000 ,12:547-549.
  • 3Louvard Y, Lefevre T, Allain A, et al. Coronary angiography through the radial or the femoral approach: The CARAFE study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2001,52 : 181-187.
  • 4Louvard Y, Ludwig J, Lefevre T, et at. Transradial approach for coronary angioplasty in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: a dual center registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2002,55:206-211.
  • 5Saito S, Miyake S, Hosokawa G, et at. Transradial coronary intervention in Japanese patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 1999,46:37-42.
  • 6Wu CJ, Lo PH, Chang KC, et al. Transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty in Chinese patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Diag,1997,40:159-163.
  • 7Saito S, Ikei H, Hosokawa G, et at. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 1999,46 : 173-178.
  • 8Yakubov SJ, George KS. Brachial and radial approach to coronary intervention. In: Freed M, Grines C, Safian RD, eds. The new manual of interventional cardiology. Michigan: Physician' s Press, 1996.65-73.
  • 9Mann T, Cubeddu G, Bowen J, et al. Stentlng in acute coronary syndromes: a comparison of radial versus femoral access sites. J Am Coll Cardlol, 1998,32:572-576.
  • 10Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerkea D, et al. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by radial,brachial and femoral approaches: the ACCESS study. J Am Coil Cardial, 1997,79 : 1239-1241.

共引文献69

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部