恽铁樵与陆渊雷学术观点比较

Comparison of Academic Viewpoints between Yun Tie - qiao and Lu Yuan - lei

恽铁樵与陆渊雷皆为弃文业医者，既广学博识，又长期涉足中医临床与中医教育，二人的医事活动都与近代中医发展密切相关。恽氏年岁稍长，持改进中医论，在近代率先比较系统地提出中西医汇通的学术思想。陆氏稍幼，坚持“中医科学化”的观点，为后期中西医汇通派的代表性人物。二人的学术思想虽有颇多共同之处，如学宗仲景，重视伤寒、倡导革新，汇通中西、反对废医等；但是也有不少明显的差异：如关于《伤寒论》与《内经》关系、温病学说、脉学理论、中医病名、日本汉方医等方面的认识。比较分析其异同，有利于借鉴、继承二人学术思想的优秀部分，促进当代中医学的发展。

Both Yun Tie-qiao and Lu Yuan -lei are medical professionals coming from the literary field with versatile and in - depth knowledge and extensive experience in medical education and clinical practice, all closely related to modern TCM development. Yun, the elder, insisted on reforming TCM and was early to advocate the academic idea of amalgamating western and traditional Chinese medicine; while Lu, the younger, insisted on the idea of ＂scientizing TCM＂ and was the representative of amalgamating western and traditional Chinese medicine in the later stage. They shared many common viewpoints, including venerating Zhang Zhongjing, stressing exogenous cold pathogens, advocating reformation and amalgamation of western medicine and TCM and objecting to the abolishment of TCM. However, there were discrepancies between them, including the relationship between the Inner Canon and the Essay on Exogenous Cold Diseases, warm disease theory, pulse theory, titles of TCM diseases and Japanese Kampo medicine. A comparison of them and noting their valuable contributions will be beneficial for the promotion of the development of TCM.