期刊文献+

企业社会责任与绩效的关系——以海天污水处理技术研究开发中心为例 被引量:1

Study on the Relevance between Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Performance——Taking Haitian Development Center of Water Treatment Technology as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 企业社会责任是企业在创造价值、对股东承担法律责任的同时,还要承担对公司、员工、顾客、供应商、政府部门、社区和环境的责任。企业社会责任要求企业必须超越把利润作为唯一目标的传统理念,强调要在生产过程中对人的价值的关注,强调对消费者、环境、社会的贡献。文章在对企业社会责任及绩效分析的基础上,构建了以社会责任为企业绩效的管理体系,并以海天污水处理技术研究开发中心为例,研究分析了该企业承担社会责任与其绩效之间的关系,以及该企业以社会责任为绩效的管理体系。 Corporate social responsibility is to create value for shareholders,in legal liability,also undertake to company,employees,customers,suppliers,government departments,community and environmental responsibility.Corporate social responsibility requires the enterprise must surpass the profit as the only goal of the traditional philosophy,emphasize on production process to the person's value,emphasize on consumers, environment and social contribution.Based on the social responsibility of the enterprise and the analysis of the performance,to set up social responsibility for the performance management system,and taking Haitian wastewater treatment technology research and development center as an example,this paper analyzes the social responsibility and the enterprise performance,and the relationship between the enterprise with social responsibility for the performance management system.
出处 《标准科学》 2010年第8期14-19,共6页 Standard Science
关键词 社会责任 企业绩效 关键绩效指标 social responsibility the enterprise performance the key performance indicators
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献24

共引文献38

同被引文献17

  • 1李艳华,凌文辁.世界企业社会责任研究与实践概述[J].技术经济与管理研究,2006(1):17-19. 被引量:15
  • 2Eberstadt N N.What History Tells Us About Corporate Soeial Reslxmsibiles. Business and Soeiety, 1973, 7:76-81.
  • 3Sheldon 0. The Soeial Responsibility of Management. In: The Philosophy of Sir Isaae Pinnan and Sons ttd, 1924:115-118.
  • 4Bowen H R. Social Responsibilities d the Businessman. New York: Harper&Row, 1953.
  • 5Davis K. Can Business Afford to Ignore Soeial Responsibilities? califomia Review, 1960, 2:70-76.
  • 6Carroll A B. A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model Performance. Academy of Review, 1979,4(4):497-505.
  • 7Wood D J. Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 1991, 16(4):691-718.
  • 8Clarkson ,.a stakeholder framework and Evaluating Corporate Social Perfonnc Academy Management Review, 1995, 20(1):92-117.
  • 9Donaldson T, Preston L. The stakeholder Theory the Corporation: Coneepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20(1):65-91.
  • 10Mitshell R K, Agle B R, Wood D J. Towant n Theory ef Staketxtt ldenfificafian and Salieree Defining the Principle of Who and What Really counts, 1997, 22(4):853-886.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部