摘要
我国公司法对发起人的规制存在制度上的缺失,发起人资本充实责任只实现了对债权人的保护,而通过限制发起人股份转让的方式并不能实现对其他股东利益的保护。面对程序性规制和实体性规制的两种模式,从规制实效性角度考虑,我国应寻求程序性的规制方法。
China’s Corporation Law has systematic defects on the regulation of sponsors, sponsors realized capital adequacy liability only to protect creditors, and the way of share transfer restrictions for sponsors cannot protect the interests of other shareholders. Between procedural and substantive regulations, from the regulatory efficiency point of view, China should seek procedural regulation methods.
出处
《证券市场导报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第8期30-36,共7页
Securities Market Herald
关键词
发起人欺诈
公司法
股份公司
证券法律
Sponsor Fraud
Corporation Law
Corporation
Securities Law