期刊文献+

石灰岩中球形装药封闭化爆试验的自由场应力和地运动 被引量:4

FREE-FIELD STRESS AND GROUND MOTION OF UNDERGROUND CONFINED CHEMICAL EXPLOSIONS WITH SPHERICAL CHARGE IN LIMESTONE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对石灰岩中50,100,800,1000和2000kg TNT的系列球形装药封闭爆炸试验的350km/kt1/3比例爆距内的自由场应力波和30km/kt1/3比例爆距内的地运动测量数据,按爆炸相似律进行归一化分析处理,拟合得到自由场应力、地表粒子速度、地表比位移及地表比加速度等特征参量峰值随比例爆心距的衰减规律,并与硬岩(花岗岩、砂岩、石灰岩)中的核爆相应结果进行对比。结果表明,化爆试验的地表比加速度峰值远小于核爆的,其他特征参量的峰值衰减规律与核爆的大体一致。讨论与自由场应力波、地表运动参数测量及数据分析相关的若干问题,指出:只有通过现场试验积累足够的数据资料,从统计学的角度来研究,才能比较客观地了解岩体中爆炸的自由场和地运动变化规律,而化爆能在一定程度上模拟核爆的力学效应。在自由场应力波测量中,化爆模拟试验需要更高频响的测试系统。在地表运动测量中,由于波传播路径上的岩体对高频波的吸收很强,在一定比例爆距外,化爆与核爆的地运动信号频率并无太大的差别,波传播路径上的岩体性质对加速度参量的影响最大,这是化爆比例加速度峰值远小于核爆的主要原因。 According to the cube root scaling law, the test data of flee-field stress(scale distance in 350 m/kt1/3)and ground motion(scale distance in 30 km/kt1/3) of a series of confined chemical explosion with spherical charges of 50, 100, 800, 1 000, 2 000 kgTNT in limestone have been analyzed, the attenuation of the free-field peak stress and the ground surface peak particle velocity, peak scaled particle displacement and peak scaled particle acceleration with scale distance are fitted, all the characteristic parameters are compared with that of nuclear explosion in hard rocks(granite, sandstone, limestone). The results show that, the ground surface peak scaled particle acceleration is far low in chemical explosions, and the others are principally in agreement with that of underground nuclear explosions. Some problems about in-situ measurements and data analysis are discussed, that mechanics effects of underground nuclear explosion could be to a certain extent simulated with underground chemical explosion is emphasized, and that a large number of on site data should be fitted statistically and it would be helpful in understanding the objective laws is also indicated. The instruments with higher frequency response must be provided in measuring free-field stress on underground chemical explosion. The higher frequency wave is attenuated quickly while propagating in rock mass, there are not distinct differences between ground motion frequencies of chemical explosion and nuclear explosion beyond a certain scale distance, acceleration is more sensitive to rock property on the travel path especially, which is the reason why the measured ground surface peak scaled particle acceleration is far low in chemical explosions.
出处 《岩石力学与工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第A01期3403-3410,共8页 Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering
关键词 爆炸力学 石灰岩 球形装药 地下爆炸 自由场应力波 地表运动 模拟试验 explosion mechanics limestone spherical charge underground explosion free-field stress ground motion simulated test
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1时振梁,王健,张晓东.中国地震活动性分区特征[J].地震学报,1995,17(1):20-24. 被引量:38
  • 2毕贵权,李宁.岩体中应力波传播与衰减规律研究现状与发展[C] // 第八次全国岩石力学与工程学术大会论文集.北京:科学出版社,2004:99-104.
  • 3CARDER D S,CLOUD T H.Surface motion from large underground explosions[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1959,64(4):1 471-1 487.
  • 4ADAMS W M,PRESTON R G,FLANDERS P L,et al.Summary report of strong-motion measurements,underground nuclear detonations[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1961,66(3):903-942.
  • 5MURPHY B F.Particle motions near explosions in halite[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1961,66(3):947-958.
  • 6WILLIAM R P,ROBORT C B.Free-field ground motion induced by underground explosions[R].SAND-74-0252,1974.
  • 7PERATT A L,OLSEN K H.Free-field ground motions for the nonproliferation experiment-Preliminary comparisons with nearby nuclear events[R].LA-US-94-1813,1994.
  • 8WALCK M C,DURRANI B A.Near-surface velocity modeling at Yucca Mountain using borehole and surface records from underground nuclear explosions[R].SAND95-1606·UC-814,1996.
  • 9WALCK M C.Summary of ground motion prediction results for Nevada test site underground nuclear explosions related to the Yucca Mountain project[R].SAND95-1938·UC-814,1996.
  • 10FOXALL W.Extreme ground motion recorded in the near-source region of underground nuclear explosions[R].UCRL-TR-208847,2005.

二级参考文献29

  • 1楼沩涛.花岗岩体中应力波传播计算的动态本构关系[J].爆炸与冲击,1989,9(3):220-227. 被引量:6
  • 2李孝兰.××化爆力学测量综合分析报告[R].西安:西北核技术研究所,1980..
  • 3林俊德.地下核爆炸力学[J].西安:西北核技术研究所,1999.17~43.
  • 4王占江.地下核试验的化爆模拟试验技术总结[R].西安:西北核技术研究所,2002..
  • 5[1]Helmberger D V,Hadley D M.Seismic Source Description of Underground Explosions and a Depth Discriminate[J].Geophys J R astr Soc,1972,31:45—66.
  • 6[2]Mclaughlin K L,Barker T G,Day S M.Implications of Explosion Generated Spall Models:Regional Seismic Signals[R].Seismic Wave Modeling and Seismic Function.AD-A227273/5/HDM,1990.
  • 7[3]Kennett B L N,Kerry N J.Seismic Wave in a Stratified Half-spcae[J].Geophys J R Astr Soc,1979,57:557—583.
  • 8[4]Helmberger D V,Hadley D M.Seismic Source Function and Attenuation from Local and Teleseismic Observations of the NTS Event Jorum and Handley[J].Bull Seism Soc Am,1981,71:51—67.
  • 9William R P, Robort C B. Free-field ground motion induced by underground explosions[R]. SAND-74-0252, 1974.
  • 10Smith C W, Grady D E, Seaman L, et el. Censtitutive relations from in situ lagrengian measurements of stress and particle velocity[R].AD746873, 1972.

共引文献89

同被引文献38

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部