期刊文献+

腰椎棘突间Coflex动态固定的三维有限元分析 被引量:6

Finite element analysis of lumbar interspinous dynamic fixation by Coflex
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较腰椎棘突间Coflex动态固定、单纯减压及坚强固定术后各节段活动度及椎间盘应力,分析Coflex系统的生物力学特点。方法运用三维有限元方法建立正常成人腰骶椎模型,及开窗减压、棘突间Coflex动态固定、椎弓根钉棒坚强固定模型,约束骶骨及髂腰韧带,施加500N预载荷和7.5Nm运动附加力,测量腰椎节段各方向的活动度及椎间盘应力。结果 Coflex固定模型活动度和椎间盘应力分别为,植入节段(L4/5):前屈3.15°,2.571MPa,后伸1.21°,2.109MPa;上位邻近节段(L3/)4:前屈3.46°,2.001MPa,后伸2.75°,3.149Mpa;下位邻近节段(L5S1):前屈3.22°,2.681MPa,后伸2.46°,3.812MP。结论 Coflex动态固定可保留植入节段部分活动度并减低其椎间盘应力,而对相邻节段活动度及椎间盘应力无明显影响。 Objective To perform the biomechanical evaluation of Coflex system by comparing the ranges of intervertebral motion and intervertebral disc stress among dynamic fixation adopting Coflex, decompression by fenestration or pedicle screw system respectively.Methods Three-dimensional finite element model of normal adult's lumbosacral vertebrae was established,as well the models of decompression by fenestration,dynamic fixation with Coflex and fixation with pedicle screw system separately.500N preload and 7.5 Nm bending moment were performed on the models,while,the range of motion(ROM)and intervertebral disc stress(IDS)were measured.Results The ROM and IDS of Coflex model were recorded respectively as follows:on the surgical segment(L4/5),flexion(FLE)3.15,2.571MPa and extension(EXT)1.21°,2.109MPa.On the upper adjacent segment(L3/4):FLE 3.46°,2.001MPa and EXT 2.75°,3.149MPa.On the lower adjacent segment(L5S1),FLE 3.22°,2.681MPa and EXT 2.46°,3.812 MP respectively.Conclusions Dynamic fixation with Coflex could keep some ROM and reduce IDS on the surgical segment,and has no significant effects on ROM and IDS of the adjacent segments.
出处 《中国临床解剖学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第4期437-441,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy
关键词 三维有限元 活动度 应力 棘突间 动态固定 COFLEX Three-dimensional finite element ROM Stress Interspinous Dynamic fixation Coflex
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Aota Y, Kumano K, Hirabayashi S. Postfusion instability at the adjacent segments afier rigid pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders[J]. J Spinal Disord, 1995,8(6): 464-.473.
  • 2Schlegel JD, Smith JA, Schleusener RL. Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions[J]. Spine, 1996,21 (8): 970-981.
  • 3徐丁,陈一衡,曾晗冰,池永龙,徐华梓.Coflex棘突间动态固定系统治疗腰椎间盘突出症的短期疗效评价[J].中华外科杂志,2009,47(18):1379-1382. 被引量:26
  • 4Kong DS, Kim ES, Eoh W. One-year outcome evaluation after interspinous implantation for degenerative spinal stenosis with segmental instability [J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2007,22(2): 330-335.
  • 5Schmidt H, Heuer F, Drumm J, et al. Application of a calibration method provides more realistic results for a ?nite element model of a lumbar spinal segment[J]. Clin Biomech, 2007, 22 (4):377-384.
  • 6Vadapalli S, Sairyo K, Goel VK, et al. Biomechnical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion: A finite element study[J]. Spine, 2006,31(26):E992-998.
  • 7Liu YK, Ray G, Hirsch C.The resistance of the lumbar spine to direct shear[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 1975,6(1):33-49.
  • 8欧军,王文军,张美超,刘洪.新型脊柱外固定器的生物力学有限元分析[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2008,26(2):199-201. 被引量:5
  • 9Tsai K-J, Murakami H, Lowery G L, et al. A biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous device (coflex^TM ) used to stabilize the lumbar spine[J]. Paragigm Spine J, 2006,1(1): 1-4.
  • 10Lindsey DP, Swanson KE, Fuchs P, et al. The Effects of an Interspinous Implant on the Kinematics of the Instrumented and Adjacent Levels in the lumbar spine[J]. Spine, 2003, 28(19):2192-2197.

二级参考文献30

共引文献60

同被引文献90

  • 1Etebar S,Cahill DW.Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability[J].J Neurosurg,1999,90(2 Suppl):163-169.
  • 2Korovessis P,Papazisis Z,Koureas G,et al.Rigid,semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis; correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short-term results[J].Spine,2004,29(7):735-742.
  • 3Chiselli C.Wang JC,Bhatia NN,et al.Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spinet[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2004,86(7):1497-1503.
  • 4Dobbs MB,Lenke LG,Kim YJ.et al.Anterior/Posterior spinal instrumentation versus posterior instrumentation alone for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliotic curves more than 90 degrees[J].Spine,2006,31(20):2386-2391.
  • 5Cheh C.Bridwell KH.Lenke LC,et al.Adjacent segment disease following lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation:a minimum 5-year follow-up[JJ.Spine,2007,32(20):2253-2257.
  • 6Bono CM,Vaccaro AR.Interspinous process devices in the lumbar spine[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2007,20(3):255-261.
  • 7Fairbank JC,Pynsent PB.The Oswestry Disability Index[J].Spine,2000,25 (22):2940-2952.
  • 8Cheung KM,Zhang YC,Lu DS,et al.Reduction of disc space distraction after anterior lumbar interbody fusion with autologous iliac crest graft[J].Spine,2003,28(13):1385-1389.
  • 9Bono CM,Lee CK.Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the past 20 years:influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcome[J].Spine,2004,29 (4):455-463.
  • 10Shono Y,Kaneda K.Abumi K,et al.Stability of posterior spinal instrumentation and its effects on adjacent motion segments in the lumbosacral spine[J].Spine,1998,23(14):1550-1558.

引证文献6

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部