摘要
依据生态足迹理论,提出基于作物生产特殊性的作物生产生态足迹模型来分析作物生产的生态盈亏。计算2007年江苏省作物生产生态足迹,并与传统模型计算的结果进行比较分析。从作物生产生态足迹模型的计算结果可以看出,江苏省作物生产生态足迹为0.232 270亿hm2,生态承载力为0.296 463亿hm2,生态盈余0.028 618亿hm2。另外,江苏省各地市作物生产生态足迹空间差异较大,南京、无锡、苏州、常州和南通的作物生产出现生态赤字,其余地市作物生产则呈现不同程度的生态盈余。研究结果表明作物生产生态足迹模型能更为客观的分析一个地区的资源禀赋,易于减小由于模型设计不合理造成的生态赤字估算扩大化现象,计算结果可作为种植业生态影响评价重要参数。
According to the ecological footprint theory,the crop porduction eco-footprint model based on the particularity of crop production was presented in this paper,in order to analysis the ecological surplus and deficit of crop production.The crop production eco-footprint and its composition in Jiangsu Province were evaluated and analyzed by using the crop production eco-footprint model in 2007.The results were compared with those which were evaluated by traditional method,and the differences were analyzed among them.When using the crop production eco-footprint model as the evaluation criterion,the ecological footprint,the ecological capacity and the ecological surplus of Jiangsu Province crop production in 2007would be 0.232 270billion hm^2,0.442 670billion hm^2,0.028 618billion hm^2 respectively.In addition,it also suggested that there was a significant spatial difference according to the crop production eco-footprint among the cities of Jiangsu Province.The crop productions of Nanjing,Wuxi,Suzhou,Changzhou and Nantong were in ecological deficit state,while other cities appeared different degree of ecological surplus state.The study results show that the crop production eco-footprint model was more objectively to analyze the land resource endowment and easy to decrease the enlargement phenomenon of ecological deficit which was caused by unreasonably designed model.The results also could be used as an important parameter for ecological impact assessment of planting.
出处
《长江流域资源与环境》
CAS
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2010年第8期890-894,共5页
Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin
基金
农业部公益性行业计划"长江下游水网农业区环境友好型农作制及关键配套技术研究与示范"(200803028)
关键词
作物生产生态足迹
生产特殊性
空间差异
可持续发展
crop production eco-footprint
the particularity of crop production
spatial difference
sustainable development