期刊文献+

Quantitative Structure-activity Relationship(QSAR) Study of Toxicity of Substituted Aromatic Compounds to Photobacterium Phosphoreum 被引量:2

Quantitative Structure-activity Relationship(QSAR) Study of Toxicity of Substituted Aromatic Compounds to Photobacterium Phosphoreum
下载PDF
导出
摘要 With the artificial neural network(ANN) method combined with the multiple linear regression(MLR),based on a series of quantum chemical descriptors and molecular connectivity indexes,quantitative structure-activity relationship(QSAR) models to predict the acute toxicity(-lgEC50) of substituted aromatic compounds to Photobacterium phosphoreum were established.Four molecular descriptors that appear in the MLR model,namely,the second order valence molecular connectivity index(2XV),the energy of the highest occupied molecular orbital(EHOMO),the logarithm of n-octyl alcohol/water partition coefficient(logKow) and the Connolly molecular area(MA),were inputs of the ANN model.The root-mean-square error(RMSE) of the training and validation sets of the ANN model are 0.1359 and 0.2523,and the correlation coefficient(R) is 0.9810 and 0.8681,respectively.The leave-one-out(LOO) cross validated correlation coefficient(Q L2OO) of the MLR and ANN models is 0.6954 and 0.6708,respectively.The result showed that the two methods are complementary in the calculations.The regression method gave support to the neural network with physical explanation,and the neural network method gave a more accurate model for QSAR.In addition,some insights into the structural factors affecting the acute toxicity and toxicity mechanism of substituted aromatic compounds were discussed. With the artificial neural network(ANN) method combined with the multiple linear regression(MLR),based on a series of quantum chemical descriptors and molecular connectivity indexes,quantitative structure-activity relationship(QSAR) models to predict the acute toxicity(-lgEC50) of substituted aromatic compounds to Photobacterium phosphoreum were established.Four molecular descriptors that appear in the MLR model,namely,the second order valence molecular connectivity index(2XV),the energy of the highest occupied molecular orbital(EHOMO),the logarithm of n-octyl alcohol/water partition coefficient(logKow) and the Connolly molecular area(MA),were inputs of the ANN model.The root-mean-square error(RMSE) of the training and validation sets of the ANN model are 0.1359 and 0.2523,and the correlation coefficient(R) is 0.9810 and 0.8681,respectively.The leave-one-out(LOO) cross validated correlation coefficient(Q L2OO) of the MLR and ANN models is 0.6954 and 0.6708,respectively.The result showed that the two methods are complementary in the calculations.The regression method gave support to the neural network with physical explanation,and the neural network method gave a more accurate model for QSAR.In addition,some insights into the structural factors affecting the acute toxicity and toxicity mechanism of substituted aromatic compounds were discussed.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2010年第8期1189-1196,共8页 结构化学(英文)
基金 supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (D0710019) the Natural Science Foundation of Overseas Chinese Affairs Office of the State Council (06QZR09)
关键词 quantitative structure-activity relationship artificial neural network multiple linear regression acute toxicity substituted aromatic compounds quantitative structure-activity relationship,artificial neural network,multiple linear regression,acute toxicity,substituted aromatic compounds
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Arcangeli, J. P.; Arvin, E. WaterSci. Technol, 1995, 31, 117-128.
  • 2Zheng, Q.; Wang, L. S. Chinese J, Struct. Chem. 2007, 26, 933-938,.
  • 3Wang, L. S.; Hart, S. K. Molecular Structures, Properties and Activities. Chemical Industry Press: Beijing 1997.
  • 4Dessalew, N. Med. Chem. Res. 2007, 16.
  • 5Roy, D. R.; Sarkar, U.; Chattaraj, P. K.; Mitra, A.; Padmanabhan, J.; Parthasarathi, R.; Subramanian, V.; van Damme, S.; Bultinck, P. Mol. Divers. 2006, 10, 119-131.
  • 6Yan, X. F.; Xiao, H. M. Chinese J. Struet. Chem. 2007, 26, 7-14.
  • 7Zhang, Z. Y.; Niu, J.F; Zhi, X. B. Environ. Contain. Tox. 2008, 81,498-502.
  • 8Agrawal, V. K.; Singh, K.; Khadikar, P. V. Med. Chem. Res. 2004, 13,479-496.
  • 9Melagraki, G.; Afantitis, A.; Sarimveis, H.; lgglessi-Markopoulou, O.; Supuran, C. T. Bioorgan. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 1108-1114.
  • 10Randie, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 6609-6615.

同被引文献7

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部