期刊文献+

左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统治疗子宫腺肌病的临床观察 被引量:1

Clinical observation of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for adenomyosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统(LNG-IUS)在治疗子宫腺肌病中的疗效和安全性。方法对40例子宫腺肌病患者放置LNG-IUS,观察放置LNG-IUS前后的痛经程度、月经量、子宫体积和不良反应,并随访1年。结果 40例患者放置LNG-IUS1年后痛经症状明显减轻(P〈0.01),月经量明显减少(P〈0.01),较放置LNG-IUS前在一定程度上缩小了子宫体积,但差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。不良反应主要是阴道点滴出血、节育器下移等。结论左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统在治疗子宫腺肌病中疗效肯定,副反应经心理调适与适当处理可以被患者接受,是子宫腺肌病安全而有效的保守治疗方法。 Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and security of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system(LNG-IUS)for adenomyosis.Methods LNG-IUS was inserted into 40 patients diagnosed as adenomyosis.The dysmenorrheal degree,menstrual flow,uterine volume and side effects before and after LNG-IUS were observed.All the patients were followed up for 12 months.Results After followed up for 12 months,dysmenorrheal was relieved,menstrual flow reduced,and uterine volume shrank in some extent.The main side effects were spotting and discharge.Conclusion Inserting LNG-IUS into uterus is a safe,effective and acceptable conservative treatment for adenomyosis.
出处 《山西医科大学学报》 CAS 2010年第8期736-737,共2页 Journal of Shanxi Medical University
关键词 左炔诺孕酮 药物释放系统 子宫腺肌病 levonorgestrel medicine releasing system adenomyosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Wildemeersch D,Rowe PJ.Assessment of menstrual blood loss in Belgian users of a new T-shaped levonorgestral-releasing intrauterine system[J].Contraception,2005,71(6):470-473.
  • 2王宁华.疼痛定量评定的进展[J].中国临床康复,2002,6(18):2738-2739. 被引量:462
  • 3Higham JM,O'Brien PMS,Shaw RW.Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chart[J].Br J Obstret Gynecol,1990,97(7):734-739.
  • 4邓姗,郎景和,冷金花,刘珠凤,孙大为,朱兰.曼月乐对子宫内膜异位症患者在位内膜增殖与凋亡的影响[J].生殖与避孕,2006,26(10):589-592. 被引量:113
  • 5Robinson R,China S,Bunkheila A,et al.Mirena intrauterine system in the treatment of menstrual disorders:a survey of UK patients experience,acceptability and satisfaction[J].J Obstet Gynaecol,2008,28(7):728-731.

二级参考文献27

  • 1[1]FISAHMAN B,PASTERNAK S,WALLENSTEIN SL,et al.The memorial pain assessment card[J].Cancer,1987,60:1151- 1158.
  • 2[2]RHIND VM,BIRD NA, WRIGHT V.A comparison of clinical assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis[J].Annals of the Rheumatic Disease,1980,39:135- 137.
  • 3[3]HUSKISSON EC,JONE J,SCOTT PJ.Application of visual analogue scales to the measurement of functional capacity[J].Rheumatology and Rehabilitation,1976,15:185- 187.
  • 4[4]DOWNIE WW,LEATHAM PA,RHIND VM.Studies with pain rating scales[J].Annals of the Rheumatics Diseases,1978, 37: 378- 381.
  • 5[5]WILKIE D,LOVEJOY N,DODD M,et al.Cancer pain intensity measurement:concurrent validity of three tools- finger dynameter,pain intensity number scale, visual analogue scale[J].Hospice Journal,1990, 6:1- 13.
  • 6[6]MARCHAND S,BUSHNELL MC,DUNCAN GH.Modulation of heat pa- in perception by high frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)[J].Clinical Journal of Pain,1991,1: 122- 129.
  • 7[7]PRICE DD,BUSH FM,LONG S,et al.A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scale[J].Pain,1994, 56: 217- 226.
  • 8[8]JESEN MP,MCFARLAND CA.Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients[J].Pain,1993,55:195- 203.
  • 9[9]RANSFORD AO, CAIRNS D,MOONEY V.The Pain drawing as an aid to the psychological evaluation of patients with low- back pain[J].Spine,1976,1(2):127- 134.
  • 10[10]MARGOLIS RB,CHIBNALL JT,TAIT RC.Test- retest reliability of the pain draw instrument[J].Pain,1988,33:49- 51.

共引文献572

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部