期刊文献+

技术不确定条件下R&D投资决策的期权博弈模型 被引量:8

Using game theory to model R&D investment decision-making under uncertainty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了分析R&D投资的不确定性、灵活性和竞争因素对投资决策的影响,将博弈论纳入实物期权方法的分析框架,在技术不确定环境下,构造研发能力和投资成本均不对称的双寡头垄断期权博弈模型,得到企业作为跟随者、领先者和同时投资者的价值函数,分析研发能力对投资临界值的影响,讨论了可能投资均衡策略.结果表明:研发能力对跟随者投资临界值影响显著,增强自身研发能力将减小投资临界值,而竞争者的研发能力增强会增加投资临界值,并且研发能力差别较大时将发生序贯均衡. In order to analyze the impact of R&D investment,it is necessary to deal with uncertainty,the need for flexibility,and incorporate competitive factors that affect investment decision-making.Game theory was incorporated into the analytical framework of real option approach.To accommodate uncertainty,a duopoly game based on asymmetric R&D capabilities and investments was constructed.In this model,cost functions for corporations who act respectively as followers,leaders,and investors were developed.The impact on investment thresholds of variations in R&D capabilities was analyzed.Possible equilibrium investment strategies were discussed.The results of the discussion indicate that R&D capability has a considerable impact on a follower's investment thresholds.Investment declined when its own R&D capacity rose,whereas it increased in response to rising R&D capability among its competitors.Further,a large gap in R&D capabilities gives rise to sequential equilibrium.
出处 《哈尔滨工程大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第8期1115-1122,1130,共9页 Journal of Harbin Engineering University
基金 国防科学技术委员会基础研究基金资助项目(Z07006)
关键词 R&D投资 期权博弈 价值函数 投资临界值 均衡 R&D investment option game value functions investment threshold equilibrium
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献38

  • 1夏晖,曾勇.不完全竞争环境下不对称企业技术创新战略投资[J].管理科学学报,2005,8(1):30-41. 被引量:26
  • 2余冬平,邱菀华.R&D投资决策的不对称双头垄断期权博弈模型[J].系统工程,2005,23(2):31-34. 被引量:28
  • 3黄学军,吴冲锋.竞争作用不对称下技术创新投资的期权博弈分析[J].系统工程,2005,23(11):75-78. 被引量:12
  • 4Smets F R. Exporting versus FDI:the effect of un-certainty,irreversibilities and strategic interactions[R]. Yale University,1991.
  • 5Smit, Han T J, Ankum L A. A real options and game-theoretic approach to corporate investment strategy under competition[J]. Financial Manage-ment,1993,22:241~250.
  • 6Huisman,Kort. Effect of strategic interactions on the option value of waiting[R].Tilburg University,1999.
  • 7Weeds H. Strategic delay in a real options model of R&D competition[R]. The University of Warwick, 2002.
  • 8Huisman K J M. Technology investment: a game theoretic real options approach[M]. Boston:Kluwer Academic Pub,2001.
  • 9Pawlina G,Kort P M. Real options in an asymmetric duopoly:who benefits from your competitive disadvantage?[R]. Tilburg University, 2002.
  • 10Dias M A G, Teixeira J P. Continuous-time option games:review of models and extensions. Part 1:Duopoly under uncertainty[R]. 7th Annual International Real Options Conference:Washington DC,2003.

共引文献38

同被引文献70

引证文献8

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部