不同引文库对学术期刊评价的影响研究——以CSSCI 1998-2009图情类期刊为例

A Study on the Impact of Academic Journal Evaluation Based on Different Citation Database:CSSCI 1998-2009 Library and Intelligence Science Journals as an Example

期刊评价变得越来越重要,国内对期刊评价的研究主要集中在评价指标,对评价工具--引文数据库的影响往往会忽略。事实上,选择不同的引文库对评价结果往往会产生颠覆性的影响。文章选用中文社会科学引文索引(Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index)和中国引文数据库(Chinese Citation Database)这两种国内比较流行的引文库作为评价工具,以CSSCI图情领域的14种来源期刊从1998-2008年间发文量、被引量、篇均被引率、h指数等评价指标入手分析比较不同引文数据库对评价结果的影响,并以相关分析来论证这种影响,得到不同引文库对重要评价指标的影响比一般指标更大的结论。最后,在结果分析的基础上提出了一些相应的改进建议。

As journal evaluation becoming increasingly important, domestic journal evaluation study focused on the evaluation index, and often overlook evaluation tools-citations database. In fact, the choice of different cita- tions database often gives disruptive impact on the evaluation results. Choosing the Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index （ Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index） and the Chinese Citation Database （ Chinese Citation Database）, two popular domestic citations database, as an evaluation tool library, making CSSCI LIS field of 14 kinds of source journals over the past 10 years as the research objects, the paper from published articles, cited volume, cited rate, h index, fully analyzed and compared with the impact of different Citation Databases on the evaluation outcomes. The paper uses correlation analysis to demonstrate the size of this effect, gets the conclusion that different citation database leads to the impact of important evaluation indexes greater than ordinary indexes. Based on the analysis the results, we put forward some relevant suggestions for improvement.