庄子的“逍遥”与“道”之同异

The Similarities and differences between "The Happy Excursion" and "Tao" in Chuang Tzu

本文的比较分析表明,"逍遥"与道体在庄子哲学中有同有异。其同表现在:从境界看,"逍遥"与道体是同一形上超越境界,即都呈现着空虚寂静、主客合一、独立自在、无边无际、无为无名、无害无苦等境状特征;从途径看,"逍遥"与道体都是道家大德通过气功修炼达到的至高境界。其异表现在:庄子一方面从本体论角度将气功极境在义理、价值上判认为宇宙本源、本体即"道",另方面从人生论角度将气功极境在义理、价值上视为无害无苦、自在自适的人生最高理想境界即"逍遥"。

Through comparative analysis,the essay tries to illustrate the similarities and differences between ＂The Happy Excursion＂ and＂Tao＂ in the philosophy of Chuang Tzu.The Same features： View from realm,＂The Happy Excursion＂and ＂Tao＂ are both beyond the real of the metaphysical,which are showing the empty silence,the identification of subject and object,independent free,boundless,no government and no name,no miseries and no anxiety;From the channel perspective,＂The Happy Excursion＂and ＂Tao＂ are both the highest realm which the Taoist monks reached through the practice of Qi-gong.The differences： From the ontological view,Chuang Tzu on one hand considers that he higest Qi-gong real as the origin of the universe,ontology and ＂The Way＂ in the value and public opinion,On the other hand,from the view of human life,he consides it as the idealist realm of life,as no suffering,no miseries,self being and self happiness.