期刊文献+

不对称拔牙模式矫治安氏Ⅱ类1分类错的疗效评价 被引量:4

The effectiveness of asymmetric extraction in treatment of Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析不对称拔牙模式矫治安氏Ⅱ类1分类错前后软硬组织的变化,为临床治疗方案的选择提供参考。方法:选择安氏Ⅱ类1分类错患者30例(男11例,女19例,平均年龄13.6岁),根据不同的拔牙模式分为2组。实验组拔除2颗上颌第一前磨牙,1颗下颌第一前磨牙;对照组拔除4颗第一前磨牙。对治疗前后头颅侧位定位片进行测量分析,采用SAS6.12软件包进行独立样本t检验,比较2组软硬组织的结构变化。结果:2组矫治前、后组内比较显示,颌骨测量项目NAPog角、SNA角、ANB角、MP-SN角均有显著差异;上、下前牙的倾斜度、突度除实验组的L1-MP角外均有统计学意义;软组织测量项目中,上、下唇倾角,上唇厚度,上、下唇突度,上、下唇长度,Z角和鼻唇角均有显著差异,而下唇厚度、颏沟倾角无显著差异。2组矫治前、后变化量的组间比较显示,仅L1-MP角、U1-L1角的变化量有显著差异。结论:不对称拔牙矫治后,患者的上、下前牙均内收,软组织侧貌明显改善,能达到满意的治疗效果。 PURPOSE: To analyze hard and soft tissue profile changes before and after asymmetric extraction treatment of Angle Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion.METHODS: Thirty patients of Angle Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusions(11 males,19 females,average age 13.6 years) were divided into two groups according to their extraction approach.In asymmetric extraction group,2 first maxillary premolars and 1 first mandibular premolar were extracted.In the control group,all 4 first premolars were extracted.Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken before and after treatment to compare hard and soft-tissue changes between the two groups,and the cephalometric measurements were analysed by SAS6.12 software package for independent sample t test.RESULTS: In comparison of the changes between the two groups,significant differences in dentoskeletal measurements were observed with NAPog,SNA,ANB,MP-SN and with the inclinations of the upper and lower incisors(P〈0.01).Significant differences in soft-tissue changes were also observed in the thickness of upper lip,the Z angle(P〈0.01) and the nasolabial angle(P〈0.05).Compared to the profile before treatment,only inclination of lower incisors changed significantly after treatment(P〈0.01).CONCLUSIONS: Asymmetric extractions is feasible in treatment of Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusions evidenced by retractions of both upper and lower incisors and improves sagittal soft-tissue profile.
出处 《上海口腔医学》 CAS CSCD 2010年第4期359-365,共7页 Shanghai Journal of Stomatology
基金 上海市科学技术委员会资助项目(08DZ2271100)~~
关键词 安氏Ⅱ类1分类错 拔牙 X线头影测量 Angle Class Ⅱ division 1malocclusion Tooth extraction Cephalometric radiography
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1吕婴,张学军.中国人颜面侧貌审美的调查分析[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2000,35(3):224-226. 被引量:31
  • 2唐国华,嵇国平,丁小军.上海地区650人对软组织侧貌唇突度的审美评价[J].上海口腔医学,2003,12(2):99-102. 被引量:24
  • 3肖林喜.西北地区近5年来拔牙矫治回顾性研究[D].第四军医大学硕士学位论文.2000:17-20.
  • 4Bishara SE. Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1998,113(5):661-673.
  • 5Looi LK, Mills JR. The effect of two contrasting forms of orthodontic treatment on the facial profile[J]. Am J Orthod,1986,89(3): 507-517.
  • 6Redaly P, Kharbanda OP, Dugal R, et al. Skeletal and dental changes with nonextraction Begg mechanotherapy in patients with Class Ⅱ Division 1 malocclusion [J]. Am J Orthod and Orthop, 2000,118(6):641-648.
  • 7杜英,段银钟,杨振华,陈曦,杨彤彤,刘红.上颌单颌拔牙与双颌拔牙矫治安氏Ⅱ类1分类错的软硬组织对比研究[J].广东牙病防治,2003,11(4):296-297. 被引量:16
  • 8Janson G, Carvalho PEG, Cancado RH, et al. Cephalometric evaluation of symmetric and asymmetric extraction treatment for patients with Class Ⅱ subdivision malocclusions [J].AM J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2007,132(1):28-35.
  • 9Burstone CJ. The integumental profile [J]. Am J Orthod,1958,44(1): 1-25.
  • 10Park YC, Burstone CJ. Soft-tissue profile-Fallacies of hard- tissue standards in treatment planning[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1986,90(1):52-62.

二级参考文献34

共引文献165

同被引文献31

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部