男性化的史学与优伶性别的史学“前判断”

Historiography of masculinization and pre-judgement of historiography of gender of actor or actress

在中国史学中,由于选材、笔法、细节等元素都难以超越所在时代和史官个人的先验主体,从而使中国历史也成为一部男性化的历史,或者说是一部贯穿男性气质和意识的历史。中国史学对于男性、女性有着不同的性别前判断,也就影响到了对于优伶性别的态度。男女优伶性别因为整体女性化的社会性别身份,为史学所回避,正史记载甚少,即使有所记载,也基本上是男性优伶,而且,男性优伶在史学中呈现出一种政治化的素质。这似乎与男性优伶的女性化的社会性别身份"互相冲突",但是,它实质上是从相反的角度"通过相互合作而互相加强",来共同巩固和稳定社会性别原则。

In Chinese historiography,because elements such as selection of materials,writing style,details,etc.can not transcend the times and historian a priori subject,the Chinese history becomes a history of masculinization,that is,a history full of masculine character and consciousness.Chinese historiography has different gender pre-judegement of male and female,which influences the attitude towards actor or actress.The gender of actor or actress is characterized by the social gender identity of the whole feminization,it is avoided by historiography.It is seldom recorded in official history with actors as exception.The actors have quality of politicization in historiography,which seems to have mutual conflict with the social gender identity of the feminization of actors.In fact,they consolidate and stabilize the social gender principle through mutual cooperation and strengthening.