摘要
目的比较腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗输卵管妊娠的疗效。方法分析156例输卵管妊娠的病例,腹腔镜手术94例,开腹手术62例,比较两组手术时间、术中出血量,抗生素应用时间、术后住院天数、术后疼痛及切口愈合情况。结果腹腔镜手术组术中出血量、术后应用止痛药、术后住院时间、术后抗生素使用时间明显优于开腹手术组(P<0.05)。结论在治疗输卵管妊娠方面,腹腔镜手术优于开腹手术。
Objective To compare the curative effects of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery on tubal pregnancy.Methods Among 156 cases with tubal pregnancy,94 cases received laparoscopic surgery and 62 cases received laparotomy. The surgical time, bleeding volume, postoperative morbidity, antibiotics application time, the number of days of postoperative hospitalization, postoperative analgesia pump usage,and incision healing status were compared between the two groups.Results The volume of blood loss, postoperative pain medication, postoperative length of hospital stay and postoperative time of useing antibiotics were significantly better in laparoscopic surgery group than open surgery group.Conclusion The effect of laparoscopic surgery on tubal pregnancy is superior to open surgery.
出处
《华南国防医学杂志》
CAS
2010年第4期264-265,271,共3页
Military Medical Journal of South China
关键词
腹腔镜手术
开腹手术
输卵管妊娠
Laparoscopic surgery
Open surgery
Tubal pregnancy