摘要
李长之是中国现代文艺批评史上著名的京派文艺批评家,他对于胡适曾经提出的"‘五四’乃是一个文艺复兴"的观点作出反思,认为"五四"是启蒙而非"文艺复兴"。在此基础上,他倡导一种从语言层面体验作家生命情感的文艺批评方法,并积极从中国古代文化中去发掘"完人"人格和充溢着旺盛生命力的审美资源,以此来弥补"五四"新文化运动所造成的"生命力"匮乏的裂痕。
LI Changzhi, the famous literary critic for Beijing School in the history of literary criticism in modern China, reflected the viewpoint "'May 4th ' is a renaissance" by HU Shi and argued that "May 4th" was enlightenment rather than renaissance. On that basis, he proposed the literary critic method which experienced authors' emotion of life from the perspective of language. He tried to research the personnel of "perfect person" and the resource of aesthetic appreciation which was full of vigorous power of life to make up the fissure of lacking "power of life" made by the New Culture Movement of" May 4th".
出处
《聊城大学学报(社会科学版)》
2010年第4期19-23,共5页
Journal of Liaocheng University:Social Science Edition
关键词
李长之
“五四”新文化运动
生命情感
完人
LI Changzhi
the New Culture Movement of" May 4th"
Emotion of Life,Perfect Person