摘要
郭沫若把屈原定位为坚决推动新兴社会制度成长、坚决反对没落社会制度复辟、始终同广大人民共同斗争的革命领袖人物。郭氏热情歌颂屈原长期遭受反动势力诬陷迫害,仍然为正义事业不屈不挠奋斗一生,最后为自己的祖国献出生命。郭氏尊崇屈原为"伟大的革命政治活动家",宣称两千多年的中国志士仁人都是在他的影响、感召下,继承他的意识进行斗争。这些都不符合历史事实。
IGuo Moruo positioned Qu Yuan as a leader who was determined to push the growth of innovations of social systems.In Guo’s description, Qu Yuan was someone who was firmly opposed to the recovery of the declining social systems, and who was consistently fighting against the injustice together with the masses.Guo highly praised Qu Yuan in that, although he had suffered prolonged political frame-up and persecution, he still strove with great perseverance for justice throughout his life till the very end.Guo claimed Qu Yuan to be "a great activist of revolutionary politics", alleging that in the past 2,000 years, Chinese advanced elements have been striving under the influence of Gu Yuan’s ideas and thoughts.These are not the truth.
出处
《攀枝花学院学报》
2010年第4期59-64,共6页
Journal of Panzhihua University