期刊文献+

战略承诺约束下的企业战略定位演化效应研究 被引量:6

Evolution Effect of Firm's Strategic Positioning Based on Influence of Strategic Commitment
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着动态导向观在战略管理领域的兴起,战略演化研究开始从高度分散走向收敛,在动态竞争环境下,企业的战略承诺投入、决心和程度的不同可能对战略定位的演化产生影响,剖析这一复杂的动态演化过程更适宜用质化研究方法。基于单一案例进行扎根理论式的实地研究,结合多重案例的跨案例检验,识别战略承诺的构成,探讨战略承诺影响战略定位演化效应的方式。研究结果表明,战略承诺是一个独特的战略要素,它来自于组织战略生成和演化的过程以及他们所促进的微观战略行为的决策过程,它在市场、资源和能力、价值活动以及组织层面的承诺表现影响着战略定位的惯性、一致性、持续性以及适应性演化。 Along with the rise of dynamic-oriented view in the field of strategic management, the research on strategy evolution turns from high decentralization to convergence. The differences on investment, determination and degree of strategic commitment may have influence on strategic positioning evolution in dynamic competitions. It is more applicable to use qualitative research methods to study this complex and dynamic evolution. Using grounded theory method based on a single case, combining with multiple cases test, we identified the configuration of strategic commitment and discussed the way in which strategic commitment influence strategic positioning evolution. The results show that strategic commitment is a special strategic element, which comes from the creating and evolving process of organizational strategy and the decision-making process of micro strategic behavior promoted by the strategy. It is also can be inferred that strategic commitment represented in the aspects of market, resource and ability, value activity and organization may have influence on the inertia, consistency, continuity and adaptation evolution effect of strategic positioning.
作者 韩炜
出处 《管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第4期27-37,共11页 Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(70471061) 教育部人文社会科学项目(08JC630058) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-07-0595)~~
关键词 战略定位 演化 战略承诺 惯性 一致性 持续性 适应性 strategic positioning evolution strategic commitment inertia consistency continuity adaptation
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Miller D, Friesen P H. Structural Change and Performance: Quantum Versus Piecemeal-Incremental Approaches [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 1982,25 (4) :867-892.
  • 2Rosenkopf L, Tushman M L. The Coevolution of Community Networks and Technology:Lessons from the Flight Simulation Industry [ J ]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1998,7 (2) :311-346.
  • 3Ghemawat P, Del Sol P. Commitment versus Flexibility? [ J ] . California Management Review, 1998,40 (4) :26-43.
  • 4Ansoff H I. Corporate Strategy [ M ]. New York: McGraw- Hill, 1965.
  • 5Andrews K R. The Concept of Corporate Strategy [ M ]. Homewood, IL : Dow Jones Irwin, 1971.
  • 6Porter M E. Towards a Dynamic Theory of Strategy [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1991,12 ( S2 ) : 95-117.
  • 7Hamel G. Strategy as Revolution [ J ]. Harvard Business Review, 1996,74(4) :69-82.
  • 8Porter M. What Is Strategy ? [ J ]. Harvard Business Review, 1996,74(6) :61-77.
  • 9Bingham C B, Eisenhardt K M. Position, Leverage and Opportunity : Linking Resources A Typology of with Competitive Strategic Logics Advantage [ J ] . Managerial and Decision Economics ,2008,29(2/3): 241-256.
  • 10Burgelman R A, Grove A S. Let Chaos Reign, then Rein in Chaos-repeatedly:Managing Strategic Dynamics for Corporate Longevity [ J ] . Strategic Management Journal, 2007,28 (10) :965-979.

二级参考文献71

  • 1李志刚,李兴旺.蒙牛公司快速成长模式及其影响因素研究——扎根理论研究方法的运用[J].管理科学,2006,19(3):2-7. 被引量:142
  • 2[1][加]Mintzberg.战略历程:纵览战略管理学派[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2002.
  • 3[2]Ashforth,Fried. The Mindlessness of Organizational Behaviors[J]. Human Relations, 1988, 41:305~329
  • 4[3]Blau. The Dynamics of Bureaucracy[M].Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1955
  • 5[4]Calori. Philosophizing on Strategic Management Models[J]. Organizational Studies, 1998, 19: 281~316
  • 6[5]Coad Strategic Control. In Berry etc, Management Control[M]. London: Macmillan, 1995.
  • 7[6]Cyert,March. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm[M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall, 1963.
  • 8[7]Etzioni. Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations[M]. New York: Free Press, 1961.
  • 9[8]Gersick,Hackman. Habitual Routines in Task-performing Groups[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1990,47:65~97
  • 10[9]Goold,Quinn. Paradox of Strategic Controls[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1990,11: 43~57

共引文献104

同被引文献142

引证文献6

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部