组合与单一治理对供应链信息系统价值创造的影响被引量：11

Effect of Supply Chain Information System Value Creation Due to Single or Combining Governance Mechanism

导出

摘要针对供应链中契约与信任、权威与信任之间的治理作用是互补还是替代关系的争论,对不同治理机制选择与供应链信息系统价值创造的关系进行梳理,运用博弈分析方法探讨组合与单一治理机制选择对供应链信息系统价值创造的影响,通过25家企业的实地调查对博弈分析结论进行讨论。研究表明,当环境不确定性较高时,采用契约与信任、权威与信任组合治理比采用单一契约或权威治理对供应链信息系统价值创造的促进作用更大;当环境不确定性较低时,采用契约与信任、权威与信任组合治理比采用单一信任治理的促进作用更大;当环境不确定性处于中间状态时,难以确定上述组合与单一治理两者的优劣。 In view of arguments on substitutional or complementry relationships between formal contract governance and trust gov- ernance as well as power governance and trust governance in supply chain, this study clarifies the relationship between the choice of governance mechanism and supply chain information system value creation. With the development of a game model, we discusses the effect of single or combining governance mechanism on value creation of supply chain information system. Through field study of 25 enterprises with game theory analysis, the results show that, to enhance the supply chain information system value creation, the combining governance mechanism, formal contract and trust governance as well as power and trust governance, is better than single governance mechanism, the single formal contract as well as power governance, when the environment is in higher uncertainty, meanwhile, the effect of combining governance mechanism is better than single governance mechanism when the environment is in lower uncertainty. However, it is very hard to determine single governance mechanism is better than combining governance mechanism or not when environmental uncertainty is at medium level.

作者肖静华谢康

机构地区中山大学管理学院

出处《管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第4期86-94,共9页 Journal of Management Science

基金国家社会科学基金(08AJY038) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NCET-06-0737) 中山大学211工程三期重点学科建设项目~~

关键词供应链信息系统治理机制组合治理价值创造 supply chain information system governance mechanism combining governance value creation

分类号 C931 [经济管理—管理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献50

1Heide J B, Wathne K H, Rokkan A I. Interfirm Monitoring, Social Contracts, and Relationship Outcomes [ J ] . Journal of Marketing Research, 2007,44 ( 3 ) : 425-433.
2Teo H H, Wei K K, Benbasat I. Predicting Intention to Adopt Inter-organizational Linkages:An Institutional Perspective [ J ]. MIS Quarterly, 2003,27 ( 1 ) : 19-49.
3Wang E T G, Wei H L. Inter-organizational Governance Value Creation:Coordinating for Information Visibility and Flexibility in Supply Chains [ J ]. Decision Sciences, 2007,38 ( 4 ) : 647-674.
4Han K, Kauffman R J, Nauh B R. Relative Importance, Specific Investment and Ownership in Interorganizational Systems [ J ]. Information Technology Management, 2008,9 ( 3 ) : 181-200.
5Saraf N, Langdon C, Gosain S. IS Application Capabilities and Relational Value in Interfirm Partnerships [ J ]. Information Systems Research, 2007,18 ( 3 ) : 320-339.
6Bakos Y, Brynjolfsson E. From Vendors to Partners: Information Technology and Incomplete Contracts in Buyer- Supplier Relationships [ J ] . Journal of Organizational Computing, 1993,3 ( 3 ) : 1-33.
7Ghosh M, John G. Governance Value Analysis and Marketing Strategy [ J ] . The Journal of Marketing, 1999,63 ( Special Issue ) : 131 - 145.
8Narayanan V G, Raman A. Aligning Incentives in Supply Chains [ J ]. Harvard Business Review, 2004, 82( 11 ) :94-102.
9Williamson O E. Economic Institutions:Spontaneous and Intentional Governance [ J ] . Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1991,7 ( Special Issue ) : 159-187.
10黄辉,严静,张群洪,刘震宇.组织际信息系统对制造商与供应商间关系治理影响的实证研究[J].科技管理研究,2009,29(9):380-384. 被引量：2

二级参考文献60

1张强,纳鹏杰.从制度化信任看日本供应链企业间的合作关系[J].企业经济,2004,23(12):147-148. 被引量：7
2杨瑞龙,聂辉华.不完全契约理论:一个综述[J].经济研究,2006,41(2):104-115. 被引量：305
3Ali, M., S. Kurnia and Robert B. Johnston. Investigating lOS adoption maturity using a dyadic approach[J]. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 2009, 5(2):43-60.
4Bharadwaj, S., A. Bharadwaj and E. Bendoly. The performance effects of complementarities between information systems, marketing, manufacturing, and supply chain processes[J]. Information Systems Research, 2007, 18(4):437-454.
5Chatfield, A. T. and Niels Bjorn-Anderseu. The impact of IOS-enabled business process change on business outcomes: transformation of the value chain of Japan airlines[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1997, 14(1): 13-40.
6Garicano, L. and S. Kaplan. The Effects of Business-to-Business E-Commerce on Transaction Costs[J]. Journal of Industrial Economics, 2001, 49(4):463-485.
7Grover, V. An empirically derived model for the adoption of customer-based interorganizational systems[J]. Decision Sciences, 1993, 24(3):603-637.
8Johnston, H. R. and M. R. Vitale. Creating competitive advantage with interorganizational information systems[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1988, 12(2):153-165.
9Kumar, K. and H. G. Dissel. Sustainable collaboration: Managing conflict and cooperation in interorganizational systems[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1996, 20(3):279-300.
10Naim, M. M. The impact of the net present value on the assessment of the dynamic performance of e-commerce enabled supply chains[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2006, 104(2):382-393.