期刊文献+

11~13+6孕周与14~17+6孕周胎儿超声筛查的对比 被引量:7

Comparation of ultrasound screening for 11-13+6 versus 14-17+6 week fetus
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评价非选择孕妇11~13+6孕周和14~17+6孕周胎儿超声筛查的作用.方法 2002年1月至2008年4月在中山大学附属第一医院行11~17+6孕周胎儿首次产前常规超声检查共3645例患者,其中11~13+6孕周组1556例,14~17+6孕周组2089例.比较两组胎儿结构异常的检出率及畸形类型构成比.结果 11~13+6孕周组和14~17+6孕周组胎儿结构异常首次检出率分别为2.3%(36/1556)和3.3%(68/2089),差异无统计学意义.两组胎儿结构异常类型构成比差异有统计学意义(P=0.03).11~13+6孕周组胎儿畸形前3位为颈部异常(项颈透明层增厚及颈部淋巴水囊瘤)占31.6%(18/57),胎儿水肿占15.8%(9/57),前腹壁异常占12.3%(7/57).14~17+6孕周组胎儿畸形前3位为心血管系统异常占16.7%(18/108),中枢神经系统异常占14.8%(16/108),前腹壁异常占12.0%(13/108).结论 11~13+6孕周胎儿超声检查能诊断多种致死性胎儿畸形及检测各种染色体异常超声标记;14~17+6孕周胎儿超声检查可观察相对细微的胎儿结构异常.11~13+6孕周是早期胎儿超声筛查的理想时间. Objective To evaluate the role of ultrasound screening in fetus at 11-13+6 weeks and 14-17+6 weeks in unselected pregnant women. Methods From January 2002 to April 2008,first-time prenatal ultrasound routine examinations were performed for 3645 pregnant women at 11-17+6 gestationalweeks in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University,including 1556 cases of 11-13+6 and 2089 of 14-17+6 gestational weeks. Detection and types of structural anomalies were compared between these two groups. Results Primary detection identified fetal structural abnormalities in 2.3% (36/1556) and 3.3%(68/2089) of women at 11-13+6 and14-17+6 gestational weeks,respectively,with no statistically significant difference. However,constituents of structural anomalies varied (P=0.03),with the first three leading types being nuchal abnormalities[31.6% (18/57)](increased nuchal translucency thickness and cystic hydroma),fetal hydrops[15.8%(9/57)]and abdominal wall defects[12.3%(7/57)]in the 11-13+6 weeks group,and cardiovascular defects[16.7% (18/108)],central nervous system malformations[14.8% (16/108)]and abdominal wall defects[12.0%(13/108)]in the 14-17+6 weeks group. Conclusions The ultrasound examinations performed at 11-13+6 weeks can be useful in screening the soft markers for chromosomal abnormalities and certain fatal malformations,while those performed at 14-17+6 weeks may identify more details of fetal structure. The 11-13+6 weeks of gestation may be an optimal window for early ultrasound screening of the fetus.
出处 《中华生物医学工程杂志》 CAS 2010年第2期123-126,共4页 Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering
基金 基金项目:国家科技支撑计划(2006BA1105A04)
关键词 超声检查 产前 筛查 胎儿 畸形 早孕期 Ultrasonography,prenatal Screening Fetus Malformation Early pregnancy
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Hernadi L,Torocsik M.Screening for fetal anomalies in the 12th week of pregnancy by transvaginal sonography in an unselected population.Prenat Diagn,1997,17:753-759.
  • 2Taipale P,Amm(a)l(a) M,Salonen R,et al.Two-stage ultrasonography in screening for fetal anomalies at 13-14 and 18-22 weeks of gestation.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,2004,83:1141-1146.
  • 3Nicolaides KH.The 11~13+6 weeks scan.Fetal Med Foundation,2004,1:71-88.
  • 4Jones KL.Morphogenesis and dysmorphogenesis in recognizable patterns of human malformation// Smith DW,Saunders WB.Smith's recognizable patterns of human malformation.Philadelphia:Saunder WB Company,1997:695-705.
  • 5Becker R,Wegner RD.Detailed screening for fetal anomalies and cardiac defects at the 11-13 week scan.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2006,27:613-618.
  • 6Carvalho MHG,Brizot ML,Lopes LM,et al.Detection of fetal structural abnormalities at the 11-14 week ultrasound scan.Prenat Diagn,2002,22:1-4.
  • 7Markov D,Chemev T,Dimitrova V,et al.Ultrasound screening and diagnosis of fetal structural abnormalities between 11 and 14gestational weeks.Akush Ginekol,2004,43:3-10.
  • 8D'Ottavio G,Mandruzzato G,Meir YJ,et al.Comparisons of first and second trimester screening for fetal anomalies.Ann NYAcad Sci,1998,847:200-209.
  • 9Taipale P,Amm(a)l(a) M,Salonen R,et al.Learning curve in ultrasonographic screening for selected fetal structural anomalies in early pregnancy.Obstet Gynecol,2003,101:273-278.
  • 10李秋明,韩瑾,虞翌?,曾春连,沈汉兵.高危妊娠11-14周胎儿的超声筛查[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2008,16(1):70-71. 被引量:12

二级参考文献20

  • 1Papp Z, Fekete T. The evolving role of ultrasound in obstetrics/gynecology practice. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2003,82(3):339-346.
  • 2Berman MC, Cohen HL. Obstetrics and gynecology: diagnostic medical sonography. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1997.211-357.
  • 3Jones KL. Morphogenesis and dysmorphogenesis. In Recognizable Patterns of Human Malformation[M]. Smith DW(ed). W.B. Saunders: Philadelphia, 1997. 695 - 705.
  • 4Min Chen, Yung Hang Lam, Chin Peng Lee, et al. Ultrasound screening of fetal structural abnormalities at 12 to 14 weeks in Hongkong [J]. Prenat Diagn, 2004,24:92 - 97.
  • 5M H B Carvalho, M 1 Brizot, L M Lopes, et al. Detection of fetal structural abnormalities at the 11-14 week ultrasound scan [ J ]. Prenat Diagn, 2002,22 : 1 - 4.
  • 6Nicolaides KH. Nuchal translucency and other first - trimester sonographic markers of chromosomal abnormalities [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2004,191 : 45 - 67.
  • 7D ottavio, G Meir, Y J Rustio, et al. Pilot screening for fetal malformation : possibilities and limits of transvaginal sonography [J]. J Ultrsound Med ,1995,14:575 - 580.
  • 8Nicolaides KH. The 11-13^+6 weeks scan[J]. Fetal Med Foundation ,2004, 71-88.
  • 9Souka AP, Nicolaides KH. Diagnosis of fetal abnormalities at the 10-14-week scan [ J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 1997, 10: 429-442.
  • 10Economides DL. Early pregnancy screening for fetal abnormalities[ J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 1999,13 : 81-83.

共引文献64

同被引文献56

引证文献7

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部