期刊文献+

两种托槽临床脱落率的对比研究 被引量:1

Comparison of the rate of bond failure between patients treated with self-ligating brackets and conventional straight wire brackets
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较自锁托槽与传统直丝托槽在矫治过程中的脱落率。方法:选择正畸患者120例(男74例,女66例),其中60例使用自锁托槽,60例使用传统直丝托槽,记录6个月内托槽脱落例数。结果:两种托槽脱落率无显著差异(P>0.05);1~3月托槽脱落率高于4~6个月,但没有统计学意义(P>0.05);后牙脱落率高于前牙,下后牙脱落率高于上后牙,有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:两种托槽脱落率相当,不同部位、时间托槽脱落率不同。 Objective To compare the rate of bond failure between patients treated with self-ligating brackets and conventional straight wire brackets.Methods A total of 120 patients were selected,including 74 males and 66 females.60 cases were treated with self-ligating brackets,while the other 60 cases were treated with conventional straight wire brackets.The rate of bond failure during 6 months was recorded.Results There was no statistically significant difference between the rate of bond failure of self-ligating brackets and conventional straight wire brackets(P〈0.05).The rate of bond failure between the first three months was higher than the second three months,there was no statistically significant difference(P〉0.05).Posterior teeth had higher failure rate than anterior teeth,madibular posterior teeth had higher failure rate than maxillary,there was statistically significant difference(P〈0.01).Conclusion There is no significant difference between the rate of bond failure of two kinds of brackets,and different failure rate at different location and time.
出处 《中国美容医学》 CAS 2010年第8期1200-1202,共3页 Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
关键词 自锁托槽 直丝托槽 脱落率 self-ligating bracket conventional straight wire bracket the rate of bond failure
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1R,Padmanabhan S,Gnanamani J.A comparison of shearbond strength and debonding characteristics of conventional,moisture-insensitive,and self-etching primers in vitro[J].Angle Orthod,2004,74(2):264-268.
  • 2刘传红,邵金陵.青少年心理行为倾向对正畸托槽脱落率的影响[J].中国美容医学,2004,13(6):723-725. 被引量:9
  • 3陆青,丁鹏,谢丽平.正畸托槽粘接前牙面处理对托槽脱落影响的临床观察[J].口腔正畸学,2005,12(1):39-39. 被引量:11
  • 4Bishara SE,Laffoon JF,Vonald L,et al.The effect ofrepeat-ed bonding on the shearbond strength of different orthodontic adhesives[J].Am J Orthod Dento FacialOrthop,2002,121(5):521-525.
  • 5Pandis N,Polychronopoulou A,Eliades T.Failure rate of self-ligating and Edgewise brackets bonded wim conventional acidetehing and a self-etching primer:a prospective in vivo study[J].Angle Orthod,2006,76(1):119-122.
  • 6陈治清,管利民.口腔粘着学[M].北京:北京医科大学、中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1993:36.
  • 7何明宜,聂丽萍,古贵刚,陈群英,唐新娅,钱萍,曾庆华,陈世庆.临床正畸托槽脱落相关因素分析[J].北京口腔医学,2008,16(1):29-31. 被引量:19

二级参考文献14

  • 1陈星.心理辅导在正畸治疗中的应用[J].四川省卫生管理干部学院学报,2001,20(4):295-296. 被引量:1
  • 2Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Baluga L, Scribante A, Klersy C.Use of a self-etching primer in combination with a resin-modified glass ionomer: effect of water and saliva contamination on shear bond strength [J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2003,124(4):4
  • 3Ram S.Korabik K. Social and psychological motivation for or thodontic treatment[J]. Am J Orthod, 1997,72:460.
  • 4Klocke A, Shi J, Kahl-Nieke B, Bismayer U. In vitro evaluation of a moisture-active adhesive for indirect bonding[J].Angle Orthod,2003,73(6):697-701.
  • 5Zachrisson BU. A posttreatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod, 1977,71 ( 2 ) : 173 -174.
  • 6陈治清,管利民.口腔粘着学.北京:北京医科大学.中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1993.36.
  • 7Cartensen W. Clinical results after direct bonding of brackets using shorter etching times. Am J Orthod, 1986,89( 1 ) :70-71.
  • 8Graf I, Jacobi BE. Bond strength of various fluoride-releasing orthodontic bonding systems. Experimental study. J Orofac Orthop, 2000,61 (3) :191-198.
  • 9Mulcaney K, Caputo AA, Duperon DF. In vitro bracket bond strength to acid-etched or air-abraded enamel Pediatr Dent, 1999,21 (4) : 281-284.
  • 10陈振琦,彭适生.托槽直接粘接技术及其相关因素[J].上海口腔医学,1997,6(4):235-238. 被引量:6

共引文献31

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部