期刊文献+

宫颈液基薄层细胞学检查在女飞行员宫颈病变筛查中的作用

The Role of Thinprep Cytologic Test in Screening for Cervical Lesions of Female Pilots
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨宫颈液基薄层细胞学检查在女飞行员妇科体检中的作用。方法:回顾性分析2007-01~2008-12间运用宫颈液基薄层细胞学检测(TCT)及传统巴氏涂片方法,均采用TBS分类,对40名女飞行员进行宫颈病变的筛查。不典型鳞状上皮细胞(ASC-US)以上列为阳性病例,比较两种细胞学诊断结果与阴道镜下活检宫颈组织病理学结果间的关系。结果:TCT细胞学阳性病例5例,阳性率为12.5%(5/40),组织病理学阳性3例,均为人类乳头瘤状病毒感染,阳性60%(3/5);而传统细胞学的阳性检出率仅为5%(2/40),组织病理阳性率为0。结论:宫颈TCT检测能明显提高细胞学诊断的阳性率,女飞行员HPV感染现象值得关注。 Objective:To explore the role of thinprep cytologic test in the gynecologic examination of female pilots.Methods:The cervical screening results of forty female pilots from Jan.2007 to Dec.2008 were retrospectively analyzed.They were examined by thinprep cytologic test(TCT) and the traditional Pap smear method,and the samples were all classified by the bethesda system.The atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance(ASCUS) or above was determined as positive.The cytologic diagnosis by the both methods were compared with the results of cervical biopsy under colposcopy.Results:Through thinprep cytologic test(TCT),there were 5 Cytology-positive cases with the positive rate 12.5%(5/40),three of which were histopathology-positive with the positive rate 60%(3/5).While through the conventional cytology method,the positive rate was only 5%(2 /40),and the histopathology-positive rate was zero.Conclusions:The positive rate of cytologic diagnosis by thinprep cytologic test(TCT) is markedly improved;The human papillomavirus infection of female pilots should be concerned.
出处 《航空航天医药》 2010年第8期1371-1372,共2页 Aerospace Medicine
关键词 液基薄层细胞学 传统巴氏涂片 宫颈病变 TBS 组织病理学 人类乳头瘤状病毒 Thinprep cytologic test Traditional pap smear Cervical lesions The bethesda system Histopathology Human papillomavirus
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献21

  • 1Srisomboon J,J Med Assoc Thai,1996年,79卷,423页
  • 2Sulik SM, Kroeger K, Schultz JK, et al. Are fluid-based cytologies superior to the conventional papanicolaou test? a systematic review. J Fam Pract, 2001,50(12):1040-1046.
  • 3Ries L, Kosary C, Hanky B, et al. SEER cancer statistics review,1973~1995. Bethesda,MD:National Cancer Institute, 1998.
  • 4Hutchinson ML, Cassin CM, Ball HG. The efficacy of an automated preparation device for cervical cytology. Am J Clin Pathol, 1991,96(3):300-305.
  • 5Sprenger E, Schwarzmann P, Kirkpatrick M, et al. The false negative rate in cervical cytology. Acta Cytol, 1996,40(1):81-89.
  • 6Pajtler M, Audy-Jurkovic S. Pap smear adequacy-is the assessing criterion induding endocervical cells really valid? Coll Antropol, 2002,26(2):565-570.
  • 7Cheung AN, Szeto EF, Leung BS, et al. Liquid-based cytology and conventional cervical smears: a comparison study in an Asian screening population. Cancer,2003,99(6):331-335.
  • 8Abulafia O, Pezzullo JC, Sherer DM. Performance of ThinPrep liquidbased cervical cytology in comparison with conventionally prepared Papanicolaou smears: a quant itative survey. Gynecol Oncol, 2003,90(1):137-144.
  • 9Hutchinson ML, Zahniser DJ, Sherman ME, et al. Utility of liquid-based cytology for cervical carcinoma screening. Cancer, 1999,87(2):48-55.
  • 10Maxwell GL, Carlson JW, Ochoa M, et al. Costs and effectiveness of alternative strategies for cervical cancer screening in military beneficiaries. Obstet Gynocol, 2002,100(4):740-748.

共引文献1701

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部