期刊文献+

泥石流灾害生命损失风险评价初步研究 被引量:8

Preliminary risk evaluation study on life loss due to debris flow disaster
下载PDF
导出
摘要 分析了影响泥石流灾害生命损失的4个主要因素,包括泥石流强度、泥石流发生时间、风险人口脆弱性和泥石流警报时间。在目前研究的基础上,将泥石流灾害生命损失风险定义为一次泥石流灾害发生概率与其可能造成的潜在死亡人数的乘积,初步建立了泥石流灾害生命损失风险评价模型。根据2003年四川省两次泥石流灾害的有限数据,评估了泥石流灾害造成的生命损失风险,预测结果与实际数据有一定差异,主要原因是风险人口数据的准确性有待提高。 This paper is aimed to study on life loss due to debris flow disasters. In this paper, we have analyzed the influencing factors of life loss based on the characteristics of debris flow disasters, in which four main factors are illustrated: hazard intensity, incidence time, the vulnerability of population at risk, and warning time. On the above basis, this paper has put forward an opinion that the risk of life loss should be the product of the probability of the debris flow disaster with its consequences being the potential mortality. In accordance with the definition, the paper has established a risk evaluation model in which the risk of life loss is the combination of the probability of the event, the population at the risk and its potential mortality. By analyzing the influence of the debris flow hazard intensity, time of disaster incidence, the population vulnerability and warning time on the potential fatality, the ratio of the potential fatality of the population at risk can be estimated. Due to shortage of detailed historical data of such disasters, the paper has to resort to the data of the two debris flow disasters in Sichuan in 2003 as our starting point for estimation. The results show that the predicted outcomes are slightly different from the actual data and the real reason is likely to be that we still do not know exactly all the data of above influential factors, especially the data of the population at risk. Thus, it can be suggested that a lot of case studies should be collected and improve the accuracy of the data so that it is possible for the researchers to test the feasibility of the model further.
出处 《安全与环境学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第4期184-188,共5页 Journal of Safety and Environment
基金 中山大学三期"211百人计划"科研配套项目(3226131)
关键词 安全学 泥石流 生命损失 风险 风险人口 警报时间 评价模型 safety science debris flow life loss risk population at risk warning time evaluation model
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1BROWN C A,GRAHAM W J.Assessing the threat to life from dam failure[J].Water Resources Bulletin,1988,24(6):1303-1309.
  • 2DEKAY M L,MCCLELLANDL G H.Predicting loss of life in cases of dam failure and flash flood[J].Risk Analysis,1993,13(2):193-205.
  • 3GRAHAM W J.A procedure for estimating loss of life caused by dam failure[R].Denver:Dam Safety Office,U.S.Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation,1999.
  • 4JONKMAN S N,VRIJLING J K,VROUWENVELDER A C W M.Methods for the estimation of loss of life due to floods:a literature review and a proposal for a new method[J].Natural Hazards,2008,46(3):353-389.
  • 5AGS.Practice note guidelines for landslide risk management 2007[J].Australian Geomechanics,2007,42(1):64-114.
  • 6李雷,周克发.大坝溃决导致的生命损失估算方法研究现状[J].水利水电科技进展,2006,26(2):76-80. 被引量:42
  • 7周克发,李雷.我国已溃决大坝调查及其生命损失规律初探[J].大坝与安全,2006,20(5):14-18. 被引量:29
  • 8周克发,李雷,盛金保.我国溃坝生命损失评价模型初步研究[J].安全与环境学报,2007,7(3):145-149. 被引量:47
  • 9MA Yuhong(马玉宏),ZHAO Guifeng(赵桂峰).Seismic-risk analysis and its management(地震灾害风险分析及管理)[M].Beijing:Science Press,2008:197-254.
  • 10XIE Quanmin(谢全敏),XIA Yuanyou(夏元友).Landslide hazard evaluation and new methods to its treatment decision-making(滑坡灾害评价及其治理优化决策新方法)[M].Wuhan:Wuhan University of Technology Press,2008:189.

二级参考文献97

共引文献298

同被引文献148

引证文献8

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部